From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, dmatlack@google.com, vipinsh@google.com,
ajones@ventanamicro.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/18] KVM: selftests/hardware_disable_test: code consolidation and cleanup
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:16:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1nNzO2tC+DCyKWI@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221024113445.1022147-6-wei.w.wang@intel.com>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022, Wei Wang wrote:
> Remove the unnecessary definition of the threads[] array, and use the
> helper functions to create and join threads.
>
> Also move setting of the thread affinity to __vcpu_thread_create using
> attribute. This avoids an explicit step to set it after thread
> creation.
As David called out, please do this in a separate patch (one logical change per
patch).
> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c | 56 +++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c
> index f5d59b9934f1..c212d34a6714 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c
> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> -#include <pthread.h>
> #include <semaphore.h>
> #include <stdint.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> @@ -59,64 +58,39 @@ static void *sleeping_thread(void *arg)
> pthread_exit(NULL);
> }
>
> -static inline void check_create_thread(pthread_t *thread, pthread_attr_t *attr,
> - void *(*f)(void *), void *arg)
> -{
> - int r;
> -
> - r = pthread_create(thread, attr, f, arg);
> - TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "%s: failed to create thread", __func__);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void check_set_affinity(pthread_t thread, cpu_set_t *cpu_set)
> -{
> - int r;
> -
> - r = pthread_setaffinity_np(thread, sizeof(cpu_set_t), cpu_set);
> - TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "%s: failed set affinity", __func__);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void check_join(pthread_t thread, void **retval)
> -{
> - int r;
> -
> - r = pthread_join(thread, retval);
> - TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "%s: failed to join thread", __func__);
> -}
> -
> static void run_test(uint32_t run)
> {
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> struct kvm_vm *vm;
> cpu_set_t cpu_set;
> - pthread_t threads[VCPU_NUM];
> pthread_t throw_away;
> - void *b;
> + pthread_attr_t attr;
> uint32_t i, j;
> + int r;
>
> CPU_ZERO(&cpu_set);
> for (i = 0; i < VCPU_NUM; i++)
> CPU_SET(i, &cpu_set);
Uh, what is this test doing? I assume the intent is to avoid spamming all pCPUs
in the system, but I don't get the benefit of doing so.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-27 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-24 11:34 [PATCH v1 00/18] KVM selftests code consolidation and cleanup Wei Wang
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 01/18] KVM: selftests/kvm_util: use array of pointers to maintain vcpus in kvm_vm Wei Wang
2022-10-26 23:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-27 12:28 ` Wang, Wei W
2022-10-27 15:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-28 2:13 ` Wang, Wei W
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 02/18] KVM: selftests/kvm_util: use vm->vcpus[] when create vm with vcpus Wei Wang
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 03/18] KVM: selftests/kvm_util: helper functions for vcpus and threads Wei Wang
2022-10-27 0:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-27 14:02 ` Wang, Wei W
2022-10-27 14:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 04/18] KVM: selftests/kvm_page_table_test: vcpu related code consolidation Wei Wang
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 05/18] KVM: selftests/hardware_disable_test: code consolidation and cleanup Wei Wang
2022-10-27 0:16 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-10-27 14:14 ` Wang, Wei W
2022-10-27 18:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-28 2:16 ` Wang, Wei W
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 06/18] KVM: selftests/dirty_log_test: vcpu related code consolidation Wei Wang
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 07/18] KVM: selftests/max_guest_memory_test: " Wei Wang
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 08/18] KVM: selftests/set_memory_region_test: " Wei Wang
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 09/18] KVM: selftests/steal_time: vcpu related code consolidation and cleanup Wei Wang
2022-10-27 0:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 10/18] KVM: selftests/tsc_scaling_sync: vcpu related code consolidation Wei Wang
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 11/18] KVM: selftest/xapic_ipi_test: " Wei Wang
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 12/18] KVM: selftests/rseq_test: name the migration thread and some cleanup Wei Wang
2022-10-27 0:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 13/18] KVM: selftests/perf_test_util: vcpu related code consolidation Wei Wang
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 14/18] KVM: selftest/memslot_perf_test: " Wei Wang
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 15/18] KVM: selftests/vgic_init: " Wei Wang
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 16/18] KVM: selftest/arch_timer: " Wei Wang
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 17/18] KVM: selftests: remove the *vcpu[] input from __vm_create_with_vcpus Wei Wang
2022-10-24 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 18/18] KVM: selftests/kvm_create_max_vcpus: check KVM_MAX_VCPUS Wei Wang
2022-10-27 0:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-26 21:22 ` [PATCH v1 00/18] KVM selftests code consolidation and cleanup David Matlack
2022-10-27 12:18 ` Wang, Wei W
2022-10-27 15:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-27 16:24 ` David Matlack
2022-10-27 18:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-28 12:41 ` Andrew Jones
2022-10-28 15:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-07 18:11 ` David Matlack
2022-11-07 18:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-09 19:05 ` David Matlack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1nNzO2tC+DCyKWI@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox