From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] firmware/psci: demote suspend-mode warning to info level
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 13:15:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1p2f6OnN2wjCuop@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221026135445.8004-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org>
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 03:54:45PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On some Qualcomm platforms, like SC8280XP, the attempt to set PC mode
> during boot fails with PSCI_RET_DENIED and since commit 998fcd001feb
> ("firmware/psci: Print a warning if PSCI doesn't accept PC mode") this
> is now logged at warning level:
>
> psci: failed to set PC mode: -3
>
> As there is nothing users can do about the firmware behaving this way,
> demote the warning to info level and clearly mark it as a firmware bug:
>
> psci: [Firmware Bug]: failed to set PC mode: -3
>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
On the assumption that we don't have any latent issues in this case, this looks
ok to me, so:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Sudeep, does this reasonable to you?
Are there any latent issues that mean we should keep this as a pr_warn()?
Thanks,
Mark.
> ---
> drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> index e7bcfca4159f..f8fa32f0a130 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> @@ -165,7 +165,8 @@ int psci_set_osi_mode(bool enable)
>
> err = invoke_psci_fn(PSCI_1_0_FN_SET_SUSPEND_MODE, suspend_mode, 0, 0);
> if (err < 0)
> - pr_warn("failed to set %s mode: %d\n", enable ? "OSI" : "PC", err);
> + pr_info(FW_BUG "failed to set %s mode: %d\n",
> + enable ? "OSI" : "PC", err);
> return psci_to_linux_errno(err);
> }
>
> --
> 2.37.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-27 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-26 13:54 [PATCH v2] firmware/psci: demote suspend-mode warning to info level Johan Hovold
2022-10-27 10:59 ` Ulf Hansson
2022-10-27 12:15 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2022-10-27 12:58 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-11-30 6:53 ` Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1p2f6OnN2wjCuop@FVFF77S0Q05N \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox