Re: [for-next PATCH v5 03/11] RDMA: Extend RDMA kernel verbs ABI to support flush

Li Zhijian
2022-09-29T06:21:47Z

Leon, Jason

On 27/09/2022 13:53, Li Zhijian wrote:
> /*
> @@ -4321,6 +4330,8 @@ int ib_dealloc_xrcd_user(struct ib_xrcd *xrcd, struct ib_udata *udata);
> static inline int ib_check_mr_access(struct ib_device *ib_dev,
> unsigned int flags)
> {
> + u64 device_cap = ib_dev->attrs.device_cap_flags;
> +
> /*
> * Local write permission is required if remote write or
> * remote atomic permission is also requested.
> @@ -4335,6 +4346,13 @@ static inline int ib_check_mr_access(struct ib_device *ib_dev,
> if (flags & IB_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND &&
> !(ib_dev->attrs.kernel_cap_flags & IBK_ON_DEMAND_PAGING))
> return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if ((flags & IB_ACCESS_FLUSH_GLOBAL &&
> + !(device_cap & IB_DEVICE_FLUSH_GLOBAL)) ||
> + (flags & IB_ACCESS_FLUSH_PERSISTENT &&
> + !(device_cap & IB_DEVICE_FLUSH_PERSISTENT)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
Regarding of the return value of ib_check_mr_access. While updating the man page of ibv_reg_mr(3) of rdma-core,
```
IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_READ Enable Remote Read Access
IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC Enable Remote Atomic Operation Access (if supported)
IBV_ACCESS_MW_BIND Enable Memory Window Binding
IBV_ACCESS_ZERO_BASED  Use  byte offset from beginning of MR to access this MR, instead of a pointer address
IBV_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND Create an on-demand paging MR (if supported)
...
RETURN VALUE
ibv_reg_mr() / ibv_reg_mr_iova() / ibv_reg_dmabuf_mr() returns a pointer to the registered MR, or NULL if the request fails.  The local key (L_Key) field lkey is used as the lkey field of struct  ibv_sge  when  posting
buffers  with  ibv_post_* verbs, and the the remote key (R_Key) field rkey is used by remote processes to perform Atomic and RDMA operations.  The remote process places this rkey as the rkey field of struct ibv_send_wr
passed to the ibv_post_send function.
```
we can see, IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC and IBV_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND are tagged "if supported" . but currently kernel
just returns EINVAL when user registers a MR with IB_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND to RXE.

I wonder we should return -EOPNOTSUPP if the device doesn't support requested capabilities

Thanks
Li

> return 0;
> }
>