From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Guang Zeng <guang.zeng@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 00/23] SMM emulation and interrupt shadow fixes
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 22:42:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1xaz4pkH2FYSYvA@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ce3d40e-9b2a-5f81-fc62-839f788fed16@redhat.com>
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 10/27/22 19:06, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-10-27 at 18:49 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > On 10/25/22 14:47, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > > This patch series is a result of long debug work to find out why
> > > > sometimes guests with win11 secure boot
> > > > were failing during boot.
> > > >
> > > > During writing a unit test I found another bug, turns out
> > > > that on rsm emulation, if the rsm instruction was done in real
> > > > or 32 bit mode, KVM would truncate the restored RIP to 32 bit.
> > > >
> > > > I also refactored the way we write SMRAM so it is easier
> > > > now to understand what is going on.
> > > >
> > > > The main bug in this series which I fixed is that we
> > > > allowed #SMI to happen during the STI interrupt shadow,
> > > > and we did nothing to both reset it on #SMI handler
> > > > entry and restore it on RSM.
> > >
> > > I have now sent out the final/new version of the first 8 patches and
> > > will review these tomorrow. Thanks for your patience. :)
> > >
> > > Paolo
> > >
> > Thank you very much!!
>
> Queued, thanks. Note that some emulator patches should go in stable
> releases so I have reordered them in front.
Can you fix patch 04 (also patch 04 in your series[*]) before pushing to kvm/queue?
The unused variable breaks CONFIG_KVM_WERROR=y builds.
arch/x86/kvm/smm.c: In function ‘emulator_leave_smm’:
arch/x86/kvm/smm.c:567:33: error: unused variable ‘efer’ [-Werror=unused-variable]
567 | unsigned long cr0, cr4, efer;
| ^~~~
arch/x86/kvm/smm.c:567:28: error: unused variable ‘cr4’ [-Werror=unused-variable]
567 | unsigned long cr0, cr4, efer;
|
[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y1xNso2nYZkSSZ0T@google.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-28 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-25 12:47 [PATCH RESEND v4 00/23] SMM emulation and interrupt shadow fixes Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 01/23] KVM: x86: start moving SMM-related functions to new files Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 02/23] KVM: x86: move SMM entry to a new file Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 03/23] KVM: x86: move SMM exit " Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 04/23] KVM: x86: do not go through ctxt->ops when emulating rsm Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 05/23] KVM: allow compiling out SMM support Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 06/23] KVM: x86: compile out vendor-specific code if SMM is disabled Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 07/23] KVM: x86: remove SMRAM address space if SMM is not supported Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 08/23] KVM: x86: do not define KVM_REQ_SMI if SMM disabled Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 09/23] bug: introduce ASSERT_STRUCT_OFFSET Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 10/23] KVM: x86: emulator: em_sysexit should update ctxt->mode Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 11/23] KVM: x86: emulator: introduce emulator_recalc_and_set_mode Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 12/23] KVM: x86: emulator: update the emulation mode after rsm Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 13/23] KVM: x86: emulator: update the emulation mode after CR0 write Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 14/23] KVM: x86: smm: number of GPRs in the SMRAM image depends on the image format Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 15/23] KVM: x86: smm: check for failures on smm entry Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 16/23] KVM: x86: smm: add structs for KVM's smram layout Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-28 13:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 17/23] KVM: x86: smm: use smram structs in the common code Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 18/23] KVM: x86: smm: use smram struct for 32 bit smram load/restore Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 19/23] KVM: x86: smm: use smram struct for 64 " Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 20/23] KVM: svm: drop explicit return value of kvm_vcpu_map Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 21/23] KVM: x86: SVM: use smram structs Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 22/23] KVM: x86: SVM: don't save SVM state to SMRAM when VM is not long mode capable Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-25 12:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 23/23] KVM: x86: smm: preserve interrupt shadow in SMRAM Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-28 10:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-10-30 8:23 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-27 16:49 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 00/23] SMM emulation and interrupt shadow fixes Paolo Bonzini
2022-10-27 17:06 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-28 10:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-10-28 22:42 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1xaz4pkH2FYSYvA@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=guang.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yang.zhong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox