Re: [PATCH] USB: gadget: Fix use-after-free during usb config switch

gregkh
2022-11-10T13:49:07Z

On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 09:20:17PM +0800, jiantao zhang wrote:
> In the process of switching USB config from rndis to other config,
> if the hardware does not support the ->pullup callback, or the
> hardware encounters a low probability fault, both of them may cause
> the ->pullup callback to fail, which will then cause a system panic
> (use after free).
>
> The gadget drivers sometimes need to be unloaded regardless of the
> hardware's behavior.
>
> Analysis as follows:
> =======================================================================
> (1) write /config/usb_gadget/g1/UDC "none" (init.usb.configfs.rc:2)
>
> gether_disconnect+0x2c/0x1f8 (dev->port_usb = NULL)
> rndis_disable+0x4c/0x74
> composite_disconnect+0x74/0xb0
> configfs_composite_disconnect+0x60/0x7c
> usb_gadget_disconnect+0x70/0x124
> usb_gadget_unregister_driver+0xc8/0x1d8
> gadget_dev_desc_UDC_store+0xec/0x1e4
>
> In function usb_gadget_disconnect(),The ->disconnect() callback will
> not be called when gadget->ops->pullup() return an error, therefore,
> pointer dev->port will not be set to NULL. If pointer dev->port_usb
> is not null, it will cause an exception of use-after-free in step3.
>
> (2) rm /config/usb_gadget/g1/configs/b.1/f1 (init.usb.configfs.rc:8)
> (f1 -> ../../../../usb_gadget/g1/functions/rndis.gs4)
>
> rndis_deregister+0x28/0x54 (kfree(params))
> rndis_free+0x44/0x7c (kfree(rndis))
> usb_put_function+0x14/0x1c
> config_usb_cfg_unlink+0xc4/0xe0
> configfs_unlink+0x124/0x1c8
> vfs_unlink+0x114/0x1dc
>
> (3) rmdir /config/usb_gadget/g1/functions/rndis.gs4
> (init.usb.configfs.rc:11)
>
> Call trace:
> panic+0x1fc/0x3d0
> die+0x29c/0x2a8
> do_page_fault+0xa8/0x46c
> do_mem_abort+0x3c/0xac
> el1_sync_handler+0x40/0x78
> 0xffffff801138f880 (params->resp_avail is an illegal func pointer)
> rndis_close+0x28/0x34 (->rndis_indicate_status_msg->params->resp_avail)
> eth_stop+0x74/0x110 (if dev->port_usb != NULL, call rndis_close)
> __dev_close_many+0x134/0x194
> dev_close_many+0x48/0x194
> rollback_registered_many+0x118/0x814
> unregister_netdevice_queue+0xe0/0x168
> unregister_netdev+0x20/0x30
> gether_cleanup+0x1c/0x38
> rndis_free_inst+0x2c/0x58
> rndis_attr_release+0xc/0x14
> kref_put+0x74/0xb8
> config_item_put+0x14/0x1c
> configfs_rmdir+0x314/0x374
>
> In step3,function pointer params->resp_avail() is a wild pointer
> becase pointer params has been freed in step2.
>
> Free mem stack(in step2):
> usb_put_function -> rndis_free -> rndis_deregister -> kfree(params)
>
> use-after-free stack(in step3):
> eth_stop -> rndis_close -> rndis_signal_disconnect ->
> rndis_indicate_status_msg -> params->resp_avail()
>
> In function eth_stop(), if pointer dev->port_usb is NULL, function
> rndis_close() will not be called.
> If gadget->ops->pullup() return an error in step1,dev->port_usb will
> not be set to null. So, a panic will be caused in step3.
> =======================================================================
> Fixes:<0a55187a1ec8c> (USB: gadget core: Issue ->disconnect()
> callback from usb_gadget_disconnect())
> Signed-off-by: Jiantao Zhang <water.zhangjiantao@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: TaoXue <xuetao09@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c
> index c63c0c2cf649..bf9878e1a72a 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c
> @@ -734,13 +734,13 @@ int usb_gadget_disconnect(struct usb_gadget *gadget)
> }
> ret = gadget->ops->pullup(gadget, 0);
> - if (!ret) {
> + if (!ret)
> gadget->connected = 0;
> - mutex_lock(&udc_lock);
> - if (gadget->udc->driver)
> - gadget->udc->driver->disconnect(gadget);
> - mutex_unlock(&udc_lock);
> - }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&udc_lock);
> + if (gadget->udc->driver)
> + gadget->udc->driver->disconnect(gadget);
> + mutex_unlock(&udc_lock);
> out:
> trace_usb_gadget_disconnect(gadget, ret);
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- Your patch is malformed (tabs converted to spaces, linewrapped, etc.)
and can not be applied. Please read the file,
Documentation/email-clients.txt in order to fix this.

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what needs to be done
here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot