From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: of: Prepare of_gpiochip_add() / of_gpiochip_remove() for fwnode
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 15:53:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y20CZtHkaLmQj+IP@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2z7IJv2IQy+Mlsh@orome>
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 02:22:40PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 03:38:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> > + np = to_of_node(chip->fwnode);
>
> This breaks a number of GPIO controllers on Tegra where chip->fwnode
> ends up never getting set. I also see this break drivers like the MFD-
> based gpio-max77620, so I don't think this is anything specific to the
> Tegra drivers.
>
> Looking at how fwnode handling works, it seems like we're checking the
> wrong value here, since chip->fwnode is only for explicit overrides of
> the fwnode value.
>
> The below patch fixes the regression for me:
Thank you! Can you submit it as a formal fix? (Also see below)
Of if Bart prefers I can respin fixed verison. Bart?
...
> - np = to_of_node(chip->fwnode);
> + np = to_of_node(chip->gpiodev->dev.fwnode);
dev_fwnode(&chip->gpiodev->dev)
...
Your report makes me wonder if I can Cc you the patch that changes that logic,
so you can help with a testing on OF platforms.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-10 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-08 13:38 [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: of: Prepare of_gpiochip_add() / of_gpiochip_remove() for fwnode Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-08 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] gpiolib: of: Integrate of_gpiochip_init_valid_mask() into gpiochip_init_valid_mask() Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-09 8:59 ` Linus Walleij
2022-11-09 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: of: Prepare of_gpiochip_add() / of_gpiochip_remove() for fwnode Linus Walleij
2022-11-10 13:22 ` Thierry Reding
2022-11-10 13:53 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2022-11-10 15:07 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-10 15:29 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y20CZtHkaLmQj+IP@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox