From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Dmitrii Tcvetkov <me@demsh.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bisected] RAID1 direct IO redirecting sector loop since 6.0
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:22:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2FVzdcro8HCfODK@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221101001558.648ee024@xps.demsh.org>
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 12:15:58AM +0300, Dmitrii Tcvetkov wrote:
>
> # cat /proc/7906/stack
> [<0>] submit_bio_wait+0xdb/0x140
> [<0>] blkdev_direct_IO+0x62f/0x770
> [<0>] blkdev_read_iter+0xc1/0x140
> [<0>] vfs_read+0x34e/0x3c0
> [<0>] __x64_sys_pread64+0x74/0xc0
> [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x6a/0x90
> [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0xb5
>
> After "mdadm --fail" invocation the last line becomes:
> [pid 7906] pread64(13, 0x627c34c8d200, 4096, 0) = -1 EIO (Input/output error)
It looks like something isn't accounting for the IO size correctly when
there's an offset. It may be something specific to one of the stacking
drivers in your block setup. Does this still happen without the
cryptosetup step?
For a different experiment, it may be safer to just force all alignment
for stacking drivers. Could you try the following and see if that gets
it working again?
---
diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
index 8bb9eef5310e..5c16fdb00c6f 100644
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -646,6 +646,7 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b,
t->misaligned = 1;
ret = -1;
}
+ blk_queue_dma_alignment(t, t->logical_block_size - 1);
t->max_sectors = blk_round_down_sectors(t->max_sectors, t->logical_block_size);
t->max_hw_sectors = blk_round_down_sectors(t->max_hw_sectors, t->logical_block_size);
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-01 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-31 21:15 [bisected] RAID1 direct IO redirecting sector loop since 6.0 Dmitrii Tcvetkov
2022-11-01 6:45 ` Paul Menzel
2022-11-01 17:22 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2022-11-01 20:51 ` Dmitrii Tcvetkov
2022-11-01 21:18 ` Keith Busch
2022-11-01 22:08 ` Dmitrii Tcvetkov
2022-11-02 4:57 ` Dmitrii Tcvetkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2FVzdcro8HCfODK@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@demsh.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox