Re: [PATCH 11/13] x86_64: Remove pointless set_64bit() usage

Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-05T13:30:01Z

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 10:15:08AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 9:01 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > So cmpxchg_double() does a cmpxchg on a double long value and is
> > currently supported by: i386, x86_64, arm64 and s390.
> >
> > On all those, except i386, two longs are u128.
> >
> > So how about we introduce u128 and cmpxchg128 -- then it directly
> > mirrors the u64 and cmpxchg64 usage we already have. It then also
> > naturally imposses the alignment thing.
>
> Ack, except that we might have some "u128" users that do *not*
> necessarily want any alignment thing.
>
> But maybe we could at least start with an u128 type that is marked as
> being fully aligned, and if some other user comes in down the line
> that wants relaxed alignment we can call it "u128_unaligned" or
> something.

Hm, sounds maybe not so nice for another use case: arithmetic code that
makes use of u128 for efficient computations, but otherwise has
no particular alignment requirements. For example, `typedef __uint128_t
u128;` in:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib/crypto/poly1305-donna64.c
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib/crypto/curve25519-hacl64.c

I always thought it'd be nice to see that typedef alongside the others
in the shared kernel headers, but figured the requirement for 64-bit and
libgcc for some operations on some architectures made it a bit less
general purpose, so I never proposed it.

Jason