Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: intel: Use temporary variable for struct device

[Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>]

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 05:29:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Use temporary variable for struct device to make code neater.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
> index fe5bf2184cbf..e15629348cb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
> @@ -1522,14 +1522,15 @@ static int intel_pinctrl_probe_pwm(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl,
>  int intel_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  			const struct intel_pinctrl_soc_data *soc_data)
>  {
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl;
>  	int i, ret, irq;
>  
> -	pctrl = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pctrl), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	pctrl = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pctrl), GFP_KERNEL);

IMHO &pdev->dev is neater and saves an extra line. I would agree if this
would be something like &foo->bar->baz->dev but it is not.

Anyway, no feelings about this so feel free to add,

Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

for both patches.