From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24954C433FE for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 12:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231631AbiKCMWY (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2022 08:22:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46964 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231657AbiKCMWS (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2022 08:22:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC9D3BF44; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 05:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id bs21so2515176wrb.4; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 05:22:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pSgf6jiYcfVtPWJQMVHTmOxF85M+YtjytNm5UST5O0k=; b=izbaHHxtCFkvePT07BD1qfeuZBIWMdSM+hGVg49RzP/uKs+dO61RU5yF15Tg80cJoq gaRYbkyeksP+CTqljNIUQ0b6AgBz92SuOMvC9RcHexPmGB+G9BDCy28SF/16XYIvUTjq 46UPaoUy4I8cpxmn/a5bk7+7IPvMgFQxUZOvIaX6BV4eGUsUbHKOb7MpLaBHuRFCx7O7 PTST+o5fKhtQZSgkTBqmGt8PlhMlJXbUCM3BwLoeu/8MunSi+4yO8K89IToJ6uvlhajS 6N9qAe2PRBx9xkrBYYwknkRCHm95OJpq9bIEvl8o+8uSabL2d44JDmYSooqWV70imV0e xm7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=pSgf6jiYcfVtPWJQMVHTmOxF85M+YtjytNm5UST5O0k=; b=T8PxuMVePJwyloHNqKhWlTgJd/G8Cmf62luEVp3memYHaikydDKcT1aqZs0wZ7Bif9 1hDwI1wJDb8df1tbaahI5cRzL1SE2NRKDw8akoBm/FnchqgUlCzQAM1VhlWANz7f7cMZ foN+DRk8oUW32AcKPkP6ODuObpqfol/IiGvMXfBH4PsAU9Xxq87reeOuZSxCLyzmQmzl /l4akzaEFKSJstP0bVsPDlcyHPaOc6ztVzNukDctgiBbMEpJp1irEepRAkhJFW8qtvFW aNjDYgMhXWs2KN1VNFxA/gWG/SRa2x75VHJANgiS0D9j3lyvzGWtmYtcnNbncazfyYVe mVsw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0mhuvjjgZyqw+X2s2q1xRFihS5eUAXSczM4p0MukEGtRJqaYSW MmV9DWaINqwbs7b9lu94gKQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6fUf6Ip8ggD+ZWUZAq2zpubt3x556zczWNAjLLXW0IGOAdHI5bI99XkXh1Q+13mLb6xGThUQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e6ce:0:b0:236:76a2:fc80 with SMTP id y14-20020adfe6ce000000b0023676a2fc80mr18647287wrm.163.1667478134068; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 05:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ay5-20020a5d6f05000000b0022e57e66824sm966032wrb.99.2022.11.03.05.22.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Nov 2022 05:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 12:22:12 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/78] 4.19.264-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20221102022052.895556444@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221102022052.895556444@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 03:33:45AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.264 release. > There are 78 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 04 Nov 2022 02:20:38 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221016): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 115 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2086 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip