From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<john.stultz@linaro.org>, <sboyd@kernel.org>, <corbet@lwn.net>,
<Mark.Rutland@arm.com>, <maz@kernel.org>, <kernel-team@meta.com>,
<neeraju@codeaurora.org>, <ak@linux.intel.com>,
<zhengjun.xing@intel.com>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH clocksource 2/2] clocksource: Exponential backoff for load-induced bogus watchdog reads
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 10:16:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2R2Fbuef2APXhU3@feng-clx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221102184009.1306751-2-paulmck@kernel.org>
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 11:40:09AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> The clocksource watchdog will reject measurements that are excessively
> delayed, that is, by more than 1.5 seconds beyond the intended 0.5-second
> watchdog interval. On an extremely busy system, this can result in a
> console message being printed every two seconds. This is excessively
> noisy for a non-error condition.
>
> Therefore, apply exponential backoff to these messages. This exponential
> backoff is capped at 1024 times the watchdog interval, which comes to
> not quite one message per ten minutes.
>
> Please note that the bogus watchdog reads that occur when the watchdog
> interval is less than 0.125 seconds are still printed unconditionally
> because these likely correspond to a serious error condition in the
> timer code or hardware.
I saw there is ongoing discussion about some wording, overall it
looks good to me, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> [ paulmck: Apply Feng Tang feedback. ]
>
> Reported-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/clocksource.h | 4 ++++
> kernel/time/clocksource.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/clocksource.h b/include/linux/clocksource.h
> index 1d42d4b173271..daac05aedf56a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clocksource.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clocksource.h
> @@ -125,6 +125,10 @@ struct clocksource {
> struct list_head wd_list;
> u64 cs_last;
> u64 wd_last;
> + u64 wd_last_bogus;
> + int wd_bogus_shift;
> + unsigned long wd_bogus_count;
> + unsigned long wd_bogus_count_last;
> #endif
> struct module *owner;
> };
> diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> index 3f5317faf891f..de8047b6720f5 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> @@ -442,14 +442,33 @@ static void clocksource_watchdog(struct timer_list *unused)
>
> /* Check for bogus measurements. */
> wdi = jiffies_to_nsecs(WATCHDOG_INTERVAL);
> - if (wd_nsec < (wdi >> 2)) {
> - /* This usually indicates broken timer code or hardware. */
> - pr_warn("timekeeping watchdog on CPU%d: Watchdog clocksource '%s' advanced only %lld ns during %d-jiffy time interval, skipping watchdog check.\n", smp_processor_id(), watchdog->name, wd_nsec, WATCHDOG_INTERVAL);
> + if (wd_nsec > (wdi << 2) || cs_nsec > (wdi << 2)) {
> + bool needwarn = false;
> + u64 wd_lb;
> +
> + cs->wd_bogus_count++;
> + if (!cs->wd_bogus_shift) {
> + needwarn = true;
> + } else {
> + delta = clocksource_delta(wdnow, cs->wd_last_bogus, watchdog->mask);
> + wd_lb = clocksource_cyc2ns(delta, watchdog->mult, watchdog->shift);
> + if ((1 << cs->wd_bogus_shift) * wdi <= wd_lb)
> + needwarn = true;
> + }
> + if (needwarn) {
> + /* This can happen on busy systems, which can delay the watchdog. */
> + pr_warn("timekeeping watchdog on CPU%d: Watchdog clocksource '%s' advanced an excessive %lld ns during %d-jiffy time interval (%lu additional), probable CPU overutilization, skipping watchdog check.\n", smp_processor_id(), watchdog->name, wd_nsec, WATCHDOG_INTERVAL, cs->wd_bogus_count - cs->wd_bogus_count_last);
> + cs->wd_last_bogus = wdnow;
> + if (cs->wd_bogus_shift < 10)
> + cs->wd_bogus_shift++;
> + cs->wd_bogus_count_last = cs->wd_bogus_count;
> + }
> continue;
> }
> - if (wd_nsec > (wdi << 2)) {
> - /* This can happen on busy systems, which can delay the watchdog. */
> - pr_warn("timekeeping watchdog on CPU%d: Watchdog clocksource '%s' advanced an excessive %lld ns during %d-jiffy time interval, probable CPU overutilization, skipping watchdog check.\n", smp_processor_id(), watchdog->name, wd_nsec, WATCHDOG_INTERVAL);
> + /* Check too-short measurements second to handle wrap. */
> + if (wd_nsec < (wdi >> 2) || cs_nsec < (wdi >> 2)) {
> + /* This usually indicates broken timer code or hardware. */
> + pr_warn("timekeeping watchdog on CPU%d: Watchdog clocksource '%s' advanced only %lld ns during %d-jiffy time interval, skipping watchdog check.\n", smp_processor_id(), watchdog->name, wd_nsec, WATCHDOG_INTERVAL);
> continue;
> }
>
> --
> 2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-04 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-02 18:40 [PATCH clocksource 0/2] Clocksource-watchdog classification and backoff Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-02 18:40 ` [PATCH clocksource 1/2] clocksource: Add comments to classify bogus measurements Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-03 2:23 ` Waiman Long
2022-11-03 20:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-04 2:13 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-02 18:40 ` [PATCH clocksource 2/2] clocksource: Exponential backoff for load-induced bogus watchdog reads Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-03 2:28 ` Waiman Long
2022-11-03 20:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-04 0:20 ` Waiman Long
2022-11-04 0:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-04 1:01 ` Waiman Long
2022-11-04 2:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-04 13:55 ` Waiman Long
2022-11-05 2:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-05 2:49 ` Waiman Long
2022-11-05 19:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-04 2:16 ` Feng Tang [this message]
2022-11-04 2:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2R2Fbuef2APXhU3@feng-clx \
--to=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zhengjun.xing@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox