From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827D3C4332F for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 17:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231398AbiKDRVJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 13:21:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33724 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231618AbiKDRVA (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 13:21:00 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E280541995; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 10:20:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1667582458; x=1699118458; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=fXSKXTbaflS2uuSmlIGEbT7emXcpOfZgNSVzxTrME1M=; b=hwrXcLVdlr3eLzAXQtV5WjhOzVARdcDr/hGXw0lihSX8ESQ0R5jl9VE4 CPuAwP/IfWEUL8fWRohbgmxClafXGNiv4yaYkk4ZRMlcyRsC5xn9hQdBH 2wlvdBLlkSbEfNJaECwLX4/nCOGyEwBKsmRGEmSlovFhLyiPjZPYIWkiu p1ylTcTSPce4C1LkVMHNC4q40WsQStptWERl7ufQU0Vp5IyfgjlqA7I1+ LK9WaFAC4Z7Pp1tnqNMfN9l7txgoOodvFTPQnAsIw3+HM/+QUrH24+iFy QSf9ctLycu/P2e+iz7WPMYgzObR4k/jbDtfQ0jmiU4gB/DlFUVmMWT1QP A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10521"; a="374261849" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,138,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="374261849" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Nov 2022 10:20:57 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10521"; a="740699853" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,138,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="740699853" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2022 10:20:55 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1or0NB-007Syj-1S; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 19:20:53 +0200 Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 19:20:53 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Linus Walleij , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v2 1/1] gpiolib: Get rid of not used of_node member Message-ID: References: <20221103180643.79352-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 04:09:59PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 7:06 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > > All new drivers should use fwnode and / or parent to provide the > > necessary information to the GPIO library. ... > This looks good to me. Thank you! > I'm thinking about just applying it and giving > it a spin in next right away. I would like to split it, one patch, btw, had been already sent separately. So, if you are going for the Linux Next, I would like to ask for rebasing later on. Also note, it requires patches that are in Linus' W. and mine trees. It will fail if you apply without those to be proceeded first. > Linus: any objections? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko