From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>,
Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: simplify complex pointer casting
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2022 17:43:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2fkOjPM0aEfJQOl@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2dvmdGxQfmK4O6F@qemulion>
On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 01:56:01PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> Pointers to structures udphdr and dhcpMessage are derived by casting
> adjacent pointers with size_t. Such typecast of pointer using size_t
> is not preferred. The code looks complex and delicate. Simplify such
> casting by utilizing generic "void *" casting.
> While at this change, remove the unnecessary __be32 casting for member
> variable "cookie".
Wait, why is that unecessary?
And why is that part of this change, that should be a separate one, so
that it can be reverted when it's found to be buggy :)
>
> Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
> index a23f7df373ed..e9b0906d0d74 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
> @@ -610,13 +610,15 @@ void dhcp_flag_bcast(struct adapter *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
> struct iphdr *iph = (struct iphdr *)(skb->data + ETH_HLEN);
>
> if (iph->protocol == IPPROTO_UDP) { /* UDP */
> - struct udphdr *udph = (struct udphdr *)((size_t)iph + (iph->ihl << 2));
> + struct udphdr *udph = (void *)iph + (iph->ihl << 2);
>
> if ((udph->source == htons(CLIENT_PORT)) &&
> (udph->dest == htons(SERVER_PORT))) { /* DHCP request */
> - struct dhcpMessage *dhcph =
> - (struct dhcpMessage *)((size_t)udph + sizeof(struct udphdr));
> - u32 cookie = be32_to_cpu((__be32)dhcph->cookie);
> + u32 cookie;
> + struct dhcpMessage *dhcph;
Why reorder these variables?
> +
> + dhcph = (void *)udph + sizeof(struct udphdr);
> + cookie = be32_to_cpu(dhcph->cookie);
The cookie change should be separate please.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-06 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-06 8:26 [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: simplify complex pointer casting Deepak R Varma
2022-11-06 8:35 ` Philipp Hortmann
2022-11-06 16:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-11-06 17:09 ` Deepak R Varma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2fkOjPM0aEfJQOl@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=drv@mailo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=paskripkin@gmail.com \
--cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox