From: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jiantao Zhang <water.zhangjiantao@huawei.com>
Cc: "Xuetao (kirin)" <xuetao09@huawei.com>,
"stern@rowland.harvard.edu" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"jakobkoschel@gmail.com" <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>,
"geert+renesas@glider.be" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"colin.i.king@gmail.com" <colin.i.king@gmail.com>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Caiyadong <caiyadong@huawei.com>,
xuhaiyang <xuhaiyang5@hisilicon.com>,
Suzhuangluan <suzhuangluan@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: gadget: Fix CFI failure during usb config switch.
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 10:05:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2jKY9Nw1a0/951a@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4d5fcb42622441189ad0e6ca5b170c0@huawei.com>
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 08:56:06AM +0000, Jiantao Zhang wrote:
> This reverts commit 0a55187a1ec8c
Please show the full hash for this line.
>
> In the process of switching USB config from rndis to other config, if function gadget->ops->pullup() return an error,it will inevitably cause a CFI failure(Linux version 5.10.43).
Please wrap the line properly.
And CFI is not in 5.10, so why is this an issue?
>
> analysis as follows:
> ======================================================
> (1) write /config/usb_gadget/g1/UDC "none" (init.usb.configfs.rc:2)
>
> gether_disconnect+0x2c/0x1f8 (dev->port_usb = NULL)
> rndis_disable+0x4c/0x74
> composite_disconnect+0x74/0xb0
> configfs_composite_disconnect+0x60/0x7c
> usb_gadget_disconnect+0x70/0x124
> usb_gadget_unregister_driver+0xc8/0x1d8
> gadget_dev_desc_UDC_store+0xec/0x1e4
>
> in function usb_gadget_disconnect(),gadget->udc->driver->disconnect()
> will not be called when gadget->ops->pullup() return an error, therefore, pointer dev->port will not be set to NULL.
>
> (2) rm /config/usb_gadget/g1/configs/b.1/f1 (init.usb.configfs.rc:8)
> (f1 -> ../../../../usb_gadget/g1/functions/rndis.gs4)
>
> rndis_deregister+0x28/0x54
> rndis_free+0x44/0x7c
> usb_put_function+0x14/0x1c
> config_usb_cfg_unlink+0xc4/0xe0
> configfs_unlink+0x124/0x1c8
> vfs_unlink+0x114/0x1dc
>
> (3) rmdir /config/usb_gadget/g1/functions/rndis.gs4
> (init.usb.configfs.rc:11)
>
> CFI failure (target: [<ffffff814bc20c00>] 0000000068f50078):
> CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: init VIP: 00 Tainted: G W O 5.10.43 #1
> Call trace:
> __cfi_slowpath+0x300/0x3bc
> rndis_signal_disconnect+0x1e0/0x204
> rndis_close+0x24/0x2c
> eth_stop+0xd0/0x234 (if dev->port_usb != NULL, call rndis_close)
> __dev_close_many+0x204/0x2d4
> dev_close_many+0x48/0x2c8
> rollback_registered_many+0x184/0xdac
> unregister_netdevice_queue+0xf8/0x24c
> rndis_free_inst+0x78/0xc8
> rndis_attr_release+0x3c/0x84
> config_item_release+0x6c/0x180
> configfs_rmdir+0x7e0/0xca0
>
> Since the rndis memory has been freed in step2, function rndis_close cannot be called here. In function eth_stop(), if pointer dev->port_usb is NULL, function rndis_close() will not be called. So, if
> gadget->ops->pullup() return an error in step1, a CFI failure will be
> caused here.
> ======================================================
> Through above analysis, i think gadget->udc->driver->disconnect() need to be called even if gadget->udc->driver->disconnect() return an error.
I really do not understand, sorry. What does CFI have to do with
anything here? What functions are mis-matched that CFI trips over it?
And by reverting this change, don't you now have the original problem
that this commit was trying to solve?
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiantao Zhang <water.zhangjiantao@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: TaoXue <xuetao09@huawei.com>
No Fixes: tag?
No cc: stable?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-07 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-07 8:56 [PATCH] USB: gadget: Fix CFI failure during usb config switch Jiantao Zhang
2022-11-07 9:05 ` gregkh [this message]
[not found] <b71e1b4b-4d33-fc36-a35f-ea40904a40b6@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <32d2bf3e-6730-f598-afef-e8d6f4a509b0@huawei.com>
2022-11-08 15:11 ` gregkh
2022-11-09 6:35 ` Zhangjiantao (Kirin, nanjing)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2jKY9Nw1a0/951a@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=caiyadong@huawei.com \
--cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=jakobkoschel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=suzhuangluan@hisilicon.com \
--cc=water.zhangjiantao@huawei.com \
--cc=xuetao09@huawei.com \
--cc=xuhaiyang5@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox