From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
X86-kernel <x86@kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
"Jacon Jun Pan" <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"Kai Huang" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [v2 01/13] x86/microcode/intel: Prevent printing updated microcode rev multiple times
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 16:12:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2kuixb0RU9BxKls@araj-dh-work> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2e4PgwAEXuFzoMd@zn.tnic>
On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 02:35:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 05:58:49PM +0000, Ashok Raj wrote:
> > @@ -696,8 +697,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
> >
> > csig->rev = c->microcode;
> >
> > - /* No extra locking on prev, races are harmless. */
> > - if (csig->sig != prev.sig || csig->pf != prev.pf || csig->rev != prev.rev) {
> > + if (bsp && csig->rev != prev.rev) {
> > pr_info("sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, revision=0x%x\n",
> > csig->sig, csig->pf, csig->rev);
>
> And now that we've established that we don't do mixed steppings anymore
> and the microcode revision is the same system-wide, you should simply
> drop this pr_info(), in your next patch you're adding
>
> +static u32 early_old_rev;
>
> That thing should simply be
>
> /* Currently applied microcode revision */
> static u32 microcode_rev;
>
> and you simply update that one each time you update microcode and print
> it as the previous and the new one and then write the new one into this
> var and that's it. Simple.
>
I removed that preparing for the next round. We already have late-loading
capture the previous rev already. So we don't need any new changes.
[ 482.242727] microcode: Reload completed, microcode revision: 0x2b000070 -> 0x2b000081
Only missing is the ucode date, not a big deal missing it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-07 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-03 17:58 [v2 00/13] Make microcode late loading more robust Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 01/13] x86/microcode/intel: Prevent printing updated microcode rev multiple times Ashok Raj
2022-11-04 11:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-04 13:53 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2022-11-04 15:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-04 18:28 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-04 20:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-06 13:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-07 4:17 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-07 16:12 ` Ashok Raj [this message]
2022-11-07 18:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-08 23:06 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-08 23:32 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-09 9:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-03 13:51 ` [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Do not print microcode revision and processor flags tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 02/13] x86/microcode/intel: Print old and new rev after early microcode update Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 03/13] x86/microcode/intel: Fix a hang if early loading microcode fails Ashok Raj
2022-11-09 11:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-09 16:07 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-09 23:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 04/13] x86/microcode: Fix microcode_check() compare after a new uCode update Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 05/13] x86/microcode: Move late-load warning to earlier where kernel taint happens Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 06/13] x86/ipi: Support sending NMI_VECTOR as self ipi Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 07/13] x86/microcode: Place siblings in NMI loop while update in progress Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 08/13] x86/mce: Warn of a microcode update is in progress when MCE arrives Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 09/13] x86/microcode/intel: Add minimum required revision to microcode header Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 10/13] x86/microcode: Add a generic mechanism to declare support for minrev Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 11/13] x86/microcode/intel: Drop wbinvd() from microcode loading Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:59 ` [v2 12/13] x86/microcode: Display revisions only when update is successful Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:59 ` [v2 13/13] x86/microcode/intel: Add ability to update microcode even if rev is unchanged Ashok Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2kuixb0RU9BxKls@araj-dh-work \
--to=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox