From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] gpiolib: of: Integrate of_gpiochip_init_valid_mask() into gpiochip_init_valid_mask()
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 10:20:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2lMdQ/bE2w4skOO@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221107161027.43384-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Hi Andy,
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 06:10:27PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> +static unsigned int gpiochip_count_reserved_ranges(struct gpio_chip *gc)
> +{
> + int size;
> +
> + size = fwnode_property_count_u32(gc->fwnode, "gpio-reserved-ranges");
I wonder if a comment why we need even size would not be helpful.
> + if (size > 0 && size % 2 == 0)
> + return size;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int gpiochip_alloc_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *gc)
> {
> - if (!(of_gpio_need_valid_mask(gc) || gc->init_valid_mask))
> + if (!(gpiochip_count_reserved_ranges(gc) || gc->init_valid_mask))
> return 0;
>
> gc->valid_mask = gpiochip_allocate_mask(gc);
> @@ -457,8 +468,47 @@ static int gpiochip_alloc_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *gc)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int gpiochip_apply_reserved_ranges(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int sz)
> +{
> + u32 *ranges;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ranges = kmalloc_array(sz, sizeof(*ranges), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ranges)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(gc->fwnode, "gpio-reserved-ranges", ranges, sz);
> + if (ret) {
> + kfree(ranges);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + while (sz) {
> + u32 count = ranges[--sz];
> + u32 start = ranges[--sz];
I know we checked sz validity, but I wonder if re-checking it in this
function would not insulate us from errors creeping in after some other
code refactoring.
In any case,
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-07 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-07 16:10 [PATCH v1 1/2] gpiolib: of: Prepare of_gpiochip_add() / of_gpiochip_remove() for fwnode Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-07 16:10 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] gpiolib: of: Integrate of_gpiochip_init_valid_mask() into gpiochip_init_valid_mask() Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-07 18:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2022-11-07 21:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-07 21:40 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-11-08 8:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-08 13:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-07 18:14 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] gpiolib: of: Prepare of_gpiochip_add() / of_gpiochip_remove() for fwnode Dmitry Torokhov
2022-11-09 13:13 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-11-09 13:13 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-11-09 13:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2lMdQ/bE2w4skOO@google.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox