From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79D6C43219 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 08:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229794AbiKIIP7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2022 03:15:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33870 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229447AbiKIIP5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2022 03:15:57 -0500 Received: from muru.com (muru.com [72.249.23.125]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CAE1BE81; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 00:15:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BADF80FB; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 08:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 10:15:54 +0200 From: Tony Lindgren To: Dario Binacchi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michael@amarulasolutions.com, Amarula patchwork , Allison Randal , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Liang He , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Tero Kristo , Thomas Gleixner , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: ti: add of_ti_clk_register() helper Message-ID: References: <20221106154612.3474940-1-dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221106154612.3474940-1-dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Dario Binacchi [221106 17:36]: > The ti_clk_register() function is always called with the parameter of > type struct device set to NULL, since the functions from which it is > called always have a parameter of type struct device_node. Adding this > helper will allow you to register a TI clock to the common clock > framework by taking advantage of the facilities provided by the > struct device_node type. Makes sense to me. Do you have a patch to make use of this I can test with? Regards, Tony