From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0934BC4332F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231935AbiKIPPO (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2022 10:15:14 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48942 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231907AbiKIPPH (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2022 10:15:07 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 043661115B; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:15:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1668006907; x=1699542907; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1hotSbJr/nzsHTXdw6IvBY9ZABhKC6mYa3ikm0iprvY=; b=O+h8wNYOasqTmt4xXPzBt+fdKH2liZZwP6S+9Wt4Jbq1tAOPHlOwM/8w k+eHAuhbxt8MObRpPoD+NVAvxjqKsD6rwbVbBfdTpaE2Z0jtJPGi8g/9D uSEXagh3a6PT1KbokZYh7oh4NWngTiPtIh2yBGTTVJAySrJFMW3BSKMn+ baLiu1mETabUyrX6xs5UNl5vneqIXpGYtIBTCy38rZrDN242QhcCOWRFx 8VxsfD/YDfchmeNAyAOpcBEfqpKkwD40VXll+MFpFjFSQEZW5omPp0mhT /C6AmsymhlwPr7qJCLjlR8CyN/Psp03gplXAPKmTvaF+EG6nB1XIMOJlV w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10526"; a="310996457" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,150,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="310996457" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Nov 2022 07:15:06 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10526"; a="587794946" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,150,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="587794946" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2022 07:14:45 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1osmmq-009ngV-0V; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 17:14:44 +0200 Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 17:14:43 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Raul E Rangel , Bartosz Golaszewski , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mika Westerberg , Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] gpiolib: of: Drop redundant check in of_mm_gpiochip_remove() Message-ID: References: <20221109150706.38823-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221109150706.38823-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 05:07:05PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > The callers never call the function with invalid pointer. > Moreover, compiler quite likely dropped that check anyway > because we use that pointer before the check. Please, ignore this series, it was wrong offset to send the patches from. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko