From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61788C4332F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231928AbiKIPQj (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2022 10:16:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49880 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231786AbiKIPQh (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2022 10:16:37 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBFED1B9D6; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:16:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1668006997; x=1699542997; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=KY4b7NsDoGsL4SL3fvQGjKv30lEJ6m9IU4VcQT450oQ=; b=DBPXyWSTBf6FH6FY5+vucJ+pi4o26kfXbRSfWAF8aXDzA4BXjlnN1zNw hxpTZSoVup3hBpgw0ajFbCEWXMbIC4kzLuNT9wf7M/6cjckCGbCZVf5LR Zrk9+CIOpa71t/xJSa61PJ0qLQ/93wkJfJec7ben2FUCxdh2WNH4MnnHr vh14GjRooQcDNO0i+O1lg0H3GOYVZDlqOXKnoRqaLqrp8FTb5OSgxjon5 95omgE+EE9HtZvKV5XxBzVP1outtg4NHPe9LFC3sskXKNo0kYN5JVA3Hp KoilHAVuV8ZIJAItthGUZkiFmvb8kIhtv4PBDIeaqgV5LSFmlx4KVBrhD w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10526"; a="312162763" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,150,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="312162763" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Nov 2022 07:16:36 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10526"; a="811663069" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,150,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="811663069" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2022 07:16:35 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1osmob-009nj3-16; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 17:16:33 +0200 Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 17:16:33 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] gpiolib: of: Prepare of_mm_gpiochip_add_data() for fwnode Message-ID: References: <20221109150734.38874-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221109150734.38874-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 05:07:33PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > GPIO library is getting rid of of_node, fwnode should be utilized instead. > Prepare of_mm_gpiochip_add_data() for fwnode. I believe this is the last preparatory patch to get rid of of_node from GPIO chip data structure. After rc1 I will send that clean up and it would be nice to start next cycle of_node free. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko