public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: of: Prepare of_gpiochip_add() / of_gpiochip_remove() for fwnode
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:22:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2z7IJv2IQy+Mlsh@orome> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221108133853.61884-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2417 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 03:38:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> GPIO library is getting rid of of_node, fwnode should be utilized instead.
> Prepare of_gpiochip_add() / of_gpiochip_remove() for fwnode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: added tag (Dmitry)
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> index be9c34cca322..000020eb78d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> @@ -1104,9 +1104,11 @@ static int of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(struct gpio_chip *chip) { return 0; }
>  
>  int of_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip)
>  {
> +	struct device_node *np;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (!chip->of_node)
> +	np = to_of_node(chip->fwnode);
> +	if (!np)

This breaks a number of GPIO controllers on Tegra where chip->fwnode
ends up never getting set. I also see this break drivers like the MFD-
based gpio-max77620, so I don't think this is anything specific to the
Tegra drivers.

Looking at how fwnode handling works, it seems like we're checking the
wrong value here, since chip->fwnode is only for explicit overrides of
the fwnode value.

The below patch fixes the regression for me:

--- >8 ---
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
index 4be3c21aa718..760f018ae7de 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
@@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ int of_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip)
        struct device_node *np;
        int ret;

-       np = to_of_node(chip->fwnode);
+       np = to_of_node(chip->gpiodev->dev.fwnode);
        if (!np)
                return 0;

--- >8 ---

That uses the GPIO device's fwnode, which can be chip->fwnode if
chip->fwnode was explicitly specified. Otherwise this defaults to 

See gpiochip_add_data_with_key() in drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:

    677 |	/*
    678 |	 * Assign fwnode depending on the result of the previous calls,
    679 |	 * if none of them succeed, assign it to the parent's one.
    680 |	 */
    681 |	gdev->dev.fwnode = dev_fwnode(&gdev->dev) ?: fwnode;

Looks like this is only important to make sure gdev->dev.fwnode is valid
for OF, for ACPI this should be a no-op.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-10 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-08 13:38 [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: of: Prepare of_gpiochip_add() / of_gpiochip_remove() for fwnode Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-08 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] gpiolib: of: Integrate of_gpiochip_init_valid_mask() into gpiochip_init_valid_mask() Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-09  8:59   ` Linus Walleij
2022-11-09  8:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: of: Prepare of_gpiochip_add() / of_gpiochip_remove() for fwnode Linus Walleij
2022-11-10 13:22 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2022-11-10 13:53   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-10 15:07     ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-10 15:29     ` Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y2z7IJv2IQy+Mlsh@orome \
    --to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox