From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com,
pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@intel.com,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] soundwire: Provide build stubs for common functions
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 10:21:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y374VPAQcX6MkG22@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221121141406.3840561-3-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
On 21-11-22, 14:14, Charles Keepax wrote:
> Provide stub functions when CONFIG_SOUNDWIRE is not set for functions
> that are quite likely to be used from common code on devices supporting
> multiple control buses.
>
> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
> ---
>
> No changes since v2.
>
> include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
> index 902ed46f76c80..4f80cba898f11 100644
> --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
> +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
> @@ -1021,15 +1021,8 @@ int sdw_stream_add_master(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> struct sdw_port_config *port_config,
> unsigned int num_ports,
> struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream);
> -int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave,
> - struct sdw_stream_config *stream_config,
> - struct sdw_port_config *port_config,
> - unsigned int num_ports,
> - struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream);
> int sdw_stream_remove_master(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream);
> -int sdw_stream_remove_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave,
> - struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream);
> int sdw_startup_stream(void *sdw_substream);
> int sdw_prepare_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream);
> int sdw_enable_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream);
> @@ -1040,8 +1033,20 @@ int sdw_bus_prep_clk_stop(struct sdw_bus *bus);
> int sdw_bus_clk_stop(struct sdw_bus *bus);
> int sdw_bus_exit_clk_stop(struct sdw_bus *bus);
>
> -/* messaging and data APIs */
> +int sdw_compare_devid(struct sdw_slave *slave, struct sdw_slave_id id);
> +void sdw_extract_slave_id(struct sdw_bus *bus, u64 addr, struct sdw_slave_id *id);
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SOUNDWIRE)
>
> +int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave,
> + struct sdw_stream_config *stream_config,
> + struct sdw_port_config *port_config,
> + unsigned int num_ports,
> + struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream);
> +int sdw_stream_remove_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave,
> + struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream);
> +
> +/* messaging and data APIs */
> int sdw_read(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr);
> int sdw_write(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, u8 value);
> int sdw_write_no_pm(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, u8 value);
> @@ -1053,7 +1058,74 @@ int sdw_nwrite_no_pm(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, size_t count, const u8 *
> int sdw_update(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, u8 mask, u8 val);
> int sdw_update_no_pm(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, u8 mask, u8 val);
>
> -int sdw_compare_devid(struct sdw_slave *slave, struct sdw_slave_id id);
> -void sdw_extract_slave_id(struct sdw_bus *bus, u64 addr, struct sdw_slave_id *id);
> +#else
> +
> +static inline int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave,
> + struct sdw_stream_config *stream_config,
> + struct sdw_port_config *port_config,
> + unsigned int num_ports,
> + struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream)
> +{
> + return 0;
Should this and other here not return error...? Indicating sdw is not
available..? Silently ignoring may not be very helpful in debugging
> +}
> +
> +static inline int sdw_stream_remove_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave,
> + struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* messaging and data APIs */
> +static inline int sdw_read(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int sdw_write(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, u8 value)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int sdw_write_no_pm(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, u8 value)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int sdw_read_no_pm(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int sdw_nread(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, size_t count, u8 *val)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int sdw_nread_no_pm(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, size_t count, u8 *val)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int sdw_nwrite(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, size_t count, const u8 *val)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int sdw_nwrite_no_pm(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, size_t count, const u8 *val)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int sdw_update(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, u8 mask, u8 val)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int sdw_update_no_pm(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, u8 mask, u8 val)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SOUNDWIRE */
>
> #endif /* __SOUNDWIRE_H */
> --
> 2.30.2
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-24 4:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-21 14:14 [PATCH v3 0/4] Minor SoundWire clean ups Charles Keepax
2022-11-21 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] soundwire: bus: export sdw_nwrite_no_pm and sdw_nread_no_pm functions Charles Keepax
2022-11-21 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] soundwire: Provide build stubs for common functions Charles Keepax
2022-11-24 4:51 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2022-11-24 9:22 ` Charles Keepax
2022-11-24 9:32 ` Vinod Koul
2022-11-21 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] soundwire: debugfs: Switch to sdw_read_no_pm Charles Keepax
2022-11-21 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] soundwire: stream: Move remaining register accesses over to no_pm Charles Keepax
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y374VPAQcX6MkG22@matsya \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox