From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Cc: "Samuel Holland" <samuel@sholland.org>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
"Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: axp20x: Do not sleep in the power off handler
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:03:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3IgaSWb46QjljfP@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac5063a0-f03d-44ba-63a5-f55e9f2fd2de@collabora.com>
On Mon, 07 Nov 2022, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 11/7/22 12:39, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 07 Nov 2022, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/6/22 00:29, Samuel Holland wrote:
> >>> Since commit 856c288b0039 ("ARM: Use do_kernel_power_off()"), the
> >>> function axp20x_power_off() now runs inside a RCU read-side critical
> >>> section, so it is not allowed to call msleep(). Use mdelay() instead.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 856c288b0039 ("ARM: Use do_kernel_power_off()")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> >>> index 88a212a8168c..880c41fa7021 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> >>> @@ -842,7 +842,7 @@ static void axp20x_power_off(void)
> >>> AXP20X_OFF);
> >>>
> >>> /* Give capacitors etc. time to drain to avoid kernel panic msg. */
> >>> - msleep(500);
> >>> + mdelay(500);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> int axp20x_match_device(struct axp20x_dev *axp20x)
> >>
> >> ARM was doing local_irq_disable() on power-off before
> >> do_kernel_power_off() was introduced, so this should've been incorrect
> >> for a couple years at least. If I'm not missing anything.
> >
> > Is that a review? Care to provide a tag?
>
> It's a review and my point was that the "Fixes" tag in this patch
> doesn't look correct. But this is minor comment, otherwise patch looks
> okay. Hope that the relevant I2C controller driver supports atomic
> transfer that are required for power-off to work.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Thanks.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-14 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-05 21:29 [PATCH] mfd: axp20x: Do not sleep in the power off handler Samuel Holland
2022-11-06 22:40 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-11-07 9:39 ` Lee Jones
2022-11-07 11:39 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-11-14 11:03 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2022-11-07 14:33 ` Samuel Holland
2022-11-07 9:38 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3IgaSWb46QjljfP@google.com \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox