From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] net: fec: add xdp and page pool statistics
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 15:08:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3JLz1niXbdVbRH9@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221114134542.697174-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
> Drivers should never select PAGE_POOL_STATS. This Kconfig option was
> made to allow user to choose whether he wants stats or better
> performance on slower systems. It's pure user choice, if something
> doesn't build or link, it must be guarded with
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PAGE_POOL_STATS).
Given how simple the API is, and the stubs for when
CONFIG_PAGE_POOL_STATS is disabled, i doubt there is any need for the
driver to do anything.
> > struct page_pool *page_pool;
> > struct xdp_rxq_info xdp_rxq;
> > + u32 stats[XDP_STATS_TOTAL];
>
> Still not convinced it is okay to deliberately provoke overflows
> here, maybe we need some more reviewers to help us agree on what is
> better?
You will find that many embedded drivers only have 32 bit hardware
stats and do wrap around. And the hardware does not have atomic read
and clear so you can accumulate into a u64. The FEC is from the times
of MIB 2 ifTable, which only requires 32 bit counters. ifXtable is
modern compared to the FEC.
Software counters like this are a different matter. The overhead of a
u64 on a 32 bit system is probably in the noise, so i think there is
strong argument for using u64.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-14 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-11 15:35 [PATCH v3 1/1] net: fec: add xdp and page pool statistics Shenwei Wang
2022-11-14 13:45 ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-11-14 14:08 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2022-11-14 15:06 ` [EXT] " Shenwei Wang
2022-11-14 15:23 ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-11-14 21:17 ` [EXT] " Shenwei Wang
2022-11-14 21:46 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-11-16 14:33 ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-11-16 16:00 ` [EXT] " Shenwei Wang
2022-11-14 14:53 ` Shenwei Wang
2022-11-14 15:27 ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-11-14 15:31 ` [EXT] " Shenwei Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3JLz1niXbdVbRH9@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox