From: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@matbug.net>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
vschneid@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
parth@linux.ibm.com, qyousef@layalina.io, chris.hyser@oracle.com,
David.Laight@aculab.com, pjt@google.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
tj@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
joshdon@google.com, timj@gnu.org, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
yu.c.chen@intel.com, youssefesmat@chromium.org,
joel@joelfernandes.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/9] sched/fair: Add sched group latency support
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:20:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3Jq4gBB5+Qg67u7@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221110175009.18458-7-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Hi Vincent,
On 10-Nov 18:50, Vincent Guittot wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> index be4a77baf784..a4866cd4e58c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> @@ -1095,6 +1095,16 @@ All time durations are in microseconds.
> values similar to the sched_setattr(2). This maximum utilization
> value is used to clamp the task specific maximum utilization clamp.
>
> + cpu.latency.nice
> + A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
> + cgroups. The default is "0".
> +
> + The nice value is in the range [-20, 19].
> +
> + This interface file allows reading and setting latency using the
> + same values used by sched_setattr(2). The latency_nice of a group is
> + used to limit the impact of the latency_nice of a task outside the
> + group.
This control model is not clear to me.
It does not seem matching what we have for uclamp, where the cgroup values are
used to restrict how much a task can ask or give (in terms of latency here).
in the uclamp's requested-vs-effective values model:
A) a task can "request" (or give up) latency as much as it likes
B) the cgroup in which the task is in any moment limits wthe maximum
latency a task can "request" (or give up)
C) the system wide knob set the "request" limit for the root cgroup an any task
not in a cgroup.
This model seems to be what we should use here too.
IOW, for each task compute an "effective" latency_nice value which is defined
starting for a task "requested" latency value and by restricting this value
based on the (B) cgroup value and the (C) system wide value.
That's what we do in uclamp_eff_get():
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.0/source/kernel/sched/core.c#L1484
Why such a model cannot be used for latency_nice too?
Am I missing something?
Best,
patrick
--
#include <best/regards.h>
Patrick Bellasi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-14 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-10 17:50 [PATCH v8 0/9] Add latency priority for CFS class Vincent Guittot
2022-11-10 17:50 ` [PATCH v8 1/9] sched/fair: fix unfairness at wakeup Vincent Guittot
2022-11-14 3:06 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-14 11:05 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-16 2:10 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-16 8:25 ` Aaron Lu
2022-11-17 9:18 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-14 16:19 ` Patrick Bellasi
2022-11-14 16:46 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-14 19:13 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-11-15 7:26 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-10 17:50 ` [PATCH v8 2/9] sched: Introduce latency-nice as a per-task attribute Vincent Guittot
2022-11-10 17:50 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] sched/core: Propagate parent task's latency requirements to the child task Vincent Guittot
2022-11-10 17:50 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] sched: Allow sched_{get,set}attr to change latency_nice of the task Vincent Guittot
2022-11-10 17:50 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] sched/fair: Take into account latency priority at wakeup Vincent Guittot
2022-11-14 16:20 ` Patrick Bellasi
2022-11-15 15:40 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-10 17:50 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] sched/fair: Add sched group latency support Vincent Guittot
2022-11-14 16:20 ` Patrick Bellasi [this message]
2022-11-14 16:57 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-10 17:50 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] sched/core: Support latency priority with sched core Vincent Guittot
2022-11-10 17:50 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] sched/fair: Add latency list Vincent Guittot
2022-11-10 17:50 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] sched/fair: remove check_preempt_from_others Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3Jq4gBB5+Qg67u7@google.com \
--to=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chris.hyser@oracle.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=parth@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=timj@gnu.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=youssefesmat@chromium.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox