From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Hui Tang <tanghui20@huawei.com>
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yusongping@huawei.com, claudiu.beznea@microchip.com,
conor.dooley@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: microchip: check for null return of devm_kzalloc()
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:43:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3izOuF56/NywpOR@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221119054858.178629-1-tanghui20@huawei.com>
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 01:48:58PM +0800, Hui Tang wrote:
> Because of the possilble failure of devm_kzalloc(), name might be NULL and
> will cause null pointer derefrence later.
In theory, yeah?
(note to self, s/refrence/reference/, s/possilble/possible)
> Therefore, it might be better to check it and directly return -ENOMEM.
I agree with your use of might here. If the allocations do fail, we
likely aren't getting the system off the ground anyway - but there is
no harm in checking.
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
@Claudiu, supposedly I can push to the at91 repo now so I will try to do
that.
Thanks,
Conor.
>
> Fixes: d39fb172760e ("clk: microchip: add PolarFire SoC fabric clock support")
> Signed-off-by: Hui Tang <tanghui20@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c
> index 7be028dced63..32aae880a14f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,9 @@ static int mpfs_ccc_register_outputs(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_ccc_out_hw_
> struct mpfs_ccc_out_hw_clock *out_hw = &out_hws[i];
> char *name = devm_kzalloc(dev, 23, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> + if (!name)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> snprintf(name, 23, "%s_out%u", parent->name, i);
> out_hw->divider.hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_HW(name, &parent->hw, &clk_divider_ops, 0);
> out_hw->divider.reg = data->pll_base[i / MPFS_CCC_OUTPUTS_PER_PLL] +
> @@ -200,6 +203,9 @@ static int mpfs_ccc_register_plls(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_ccc_pll_hw_clo
> struct mpfs_ccc_pll_hw_clock *pll_hw = &pll_hws[i];
> char *name = devm_kzalloc(dev, 18, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> + if (!name)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> pll_hw->base = data->pll_base[i];
> snprintf(name, 18, "ccc%s_pll%u", strchrnul(dev->of_node->full_name, '@'), i);
> pll_hw->name = (const char *)name;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-19 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-19 5:48 [PATCH] clk: microchip: check for null return of devm_kzalloc() Hui Tang
2022-11-19 10:43 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2022-11-21 7:26 ` Hui Tang
2022-11-25 13:48 ` Claudiu.Beznea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3izOuF56/NywpOR@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@microchip.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tanghui20@huawei.com \
--cc=yusongping@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox