From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Jiaxi Chen <jiaxi.chen@linux.intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, ndesaulniers@google.com,
alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, peterz@infradead.org,
jpoimboe@kernel.org, chang.seok.bae@intel.com,
pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
jmattson@google.com, sandipan.das@amd.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
keescook@chromium.org, nathan@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] x86: KVM: Advertise CMPccXADD CPUID to user space
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:28:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3u1Rx/kFjE5/FFR@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3ue4PoJD7EGC5dV@zn.tnic>
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:48:06PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Actually, for these features that don't require additional KVM enabling, KVM isn't
> > making the feature avaiable to the guest. KVM is just advertising to userspace
> > that KVM "supports" these features. Userspace ultimately controls guest CPUID;
> > outside of a few special cases, KVM neither rejects nor filters unsupported bits
> > in CPUID.
>
> So is there any point to those "enable it in KVM" patches streaming constantly?
Yes. Most userspace VMMs sanitize their CPUID models based on KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID,
e.g. by default, QEMU will refuse to enable features in guest CPUID that aren't
reported as supported by KVM.
Another use case is for userspace to blindly use the result of KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID
as the guest's CPUID model, e.g. for using KVM to isolate code as opposed to standing
up a traditional virtual machine. For that use case, userspace again relies on KVM to
enumerate support.
What I was trying to call out in the above is that the KVM "enabling" technically
doesn't expose the feature to the guest. E.g. a clever guest could ignore CPUID
and probe the relevant instructions manually by seeing whether or not they #UD.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-21 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-18 14:15 [PATCH v4 0/6] x86: KVM: Advertise CPUID of new Intel platform instructions to user space Jiaxi Chen
2022-11-18 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] x86: KVM: Advertise CMPccXADD CPUID " Jiaxi Chen
2022-11-18 16:47 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-18 18:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-21 14:46 ` Jiaxi Chen
2022-11-21 15:29 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-21 15:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-21 15:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-21 17:28 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-11-21 19:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-23 6:33 ` Jiaxi Chen
2022-11-21 15:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-23 7:46 ` Jiaxi Chen
2022-11-18 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] x86: KVM: Advertise AMX-FP16 " Jiaxi Chen
2022-11-18 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] x86: KVM: Advertise AVX-IFMA " Jiaxi Chen
2022-11-18 16:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-21 14:46 ` Jiaxi Chen
2022-11-18 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] x86: KVM: Advertise AVX-VNNI-INT8 " Jiaxi Chen
2022-11-18 17:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-21 15:06 ` Jiaxi Chen
2022-11-18 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] x86: KVM: Advertise AVX-NE-CONVERT " Jiaxi Chen
2022-11-18 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] x86: KVM: Advertise PREFETCHIT0/1 " Jiaxi Chen
2022-11-18 15:11 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] x86: KVM: Advertise CPUID of new Intel platform instructions " Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3u1Rx/kFjE5/FFR@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiaxi.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox