From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>,
Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>,
Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zswap: do not allocate from atomic pool
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:30:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3xCTr6ikbtcUr/y@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3w/DFTAypX7L2mp@cmpxchg.org>
On (22/11/21 22:16), Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 10:33:38AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > zswap_frontswap_load() should be called from preemptible
> > context (we even call mutex_lock() there) and it does not
> > look like we need to do GFP_ATOMIC allocaion for temp
> > buffer there. Use GFP_KERNEL instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > mm/zswap.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
> > index 2d69c1d678fe..f6c89049cf70 100644
> > --- a/mm/zswap.c
> > +++ b/mm/zswap.c
> > @@ -1314,7 +1314,7 @@ static int zswap_frontswap_load(unsigned type, pgoff_t offset,
> > }
> >
> > if (!zpool_can_sleep_mapped(entry->pool->zpool)) {
> > - tmp = kmalloc(entry->length, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + tmp = kmalloc(entry->length, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> There is another one in zswap_writeback_entry() that seems equally
> arbitrary. They came in through the same commit, with no further
> explanation as to this choice. Do you want to pick that up too?
Yup, you patch it in https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221119001536.2086599-2-nphamcs@gmail.com/
and I guess it's there just by accident. We probably want a separate
patch instead that touches those GFP_ATOMIC allocations in both places.
So I have it like this at present
---
From 66e4acffc0926498f818d11f2f57b9c772131f6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:26:13 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] zswap: do not allocate from atomic pool
zswap_frontswap_load() should be called from preemptible
context (we even call mutex_lock() there) and it does not
look like we need to do GFP_ATOMIC allocaion for temp
buffer. The same applies to zswap_writeback_entry().
Use GFP_KERNEL for temporary buffer allocation in both
cases.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
---
mm/zpool.c | 7 +++++++
mm/zswap.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/zpool.c b/mm/zpool.c
index 68facc193496..f46c0d5e766c 100644
--- a/mm/zpool.c
+++ b/mm/zpool.c
@@ -387,6 +387,13 @@ bool zpool_evictable(struct zpool *zpool)
* zpool_can_sleep_mapped - Test if zpool can sleep when do mapped.
* @zpool: The zpool to test
*
+ * Some allocators enter non-preemptible context in ->map() callback (e.g.
+ * disable pagefaults) and exit that context in ->unmap(), which limits what
+ * we can do with the mapped object. For instance, we cannot wait for
+ * asynchronous crypto API to decompress such an object or take mutexes
+ * since those will call into the scheduler. This function tells us whether
+ * we use such an allocator.
+ *
* Returns: true if zpool can sleep; false otherwise.
*/
bool zpool_can_sleep_mapped(struct zpool *zpool)
diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
index 2d48fd59cc7a..3019f0bde194 100644
--- a/mm/zswap.c
+++ b/mm/zswap.c
@@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ static int zswap_writeback_entry(struct zpool *pool, unsigned long handle)
};
if (!zpool_can_sleep_mapped(pool)) {
- tmp = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ tmp = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tmp)
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -1311,7 +1311,7 @@ static int zswap_frontswap_load(unsigned type, pgoff_t offset,
}
if (!zpool_can_sleep_mapped(entry->pool->zpool)) {
- tmp = kmalloc(entry->length, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ tmp = kmalloc(entry->length, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tmp) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto freeentry;
--
2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-22 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-22 1:33 [PATCH] zswap: do not allocate from atomic pool Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-11-22 1:56 ` Andrew Morton
2022-11-22 2:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-11-22 3:16 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-11-22 3:30 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2022-11-24 3:32 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-11-24 3:42 ` Andrew Morton
2022-11-24 3:55 ` Nhat Pham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3xCTr6ikbtcUr/y@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ddstreet@ieee.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
--cc=vitaly.wool@konsulko.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox