From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>,
patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/62] 4.9.335-rc1 review
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:37:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y48pbLT3dmA1iQPu@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <77fff5aa-ddd2-6bc7-f0b4-46b93e87338b@intel.com>
On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 11:23:15AM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 6/12/22 02:11, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On 12/5/22 14:48, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> On 12/5/22 14:28, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >>> Hi Greg,
> >>>
> >>> On 05/12/2022 19:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.335 release.
> >>>> There are 62 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >>>> let me know.
> >>>>
> >>>> Responses should be made by Wed, 07 Dec 2022 19:07:46 +0000.
> >>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >>>>
> >>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.335-rc1.gz
> >>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
> >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
> >>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> greg k-h
> >>>>
> >>>> -------------
> >>>> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
> >>>>
> >>>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> >>>> Linux 4.9.335-rc1
> >>>>
> >>>> Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> >>>> mmc: sdhci: Fix voltage switch delay
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I am seeing a boot regression on a couple boards and bisect is pointing to the above commit.
> >>
> >> Same thing here, getting a hard lock for our devices with the SDHCI controller enabled, sometimes we are lucky to see the following:
> >>
> >> [ 4.790367] mmc0: SDHCI controller on 84b0000.sdhci [84b0000.sdhci] using ADMA 64-bit
> >> [ 25.802351] INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
> >> [ 25.807871] 1-...: (1 GPs behind) idle=561/140000000000000/0 softirq=728/728 fqs=5252
> >> [ 25.815892] (detected by 0, t=21017 jiffies, g=61, c=60, q=55)
> >> [ 25.821834] Task dump for CPU 1:
> >> [ 25.825069] kworker/1:1 R running task 0 509 2 0x00000002
> >> [ 25.832164] Workqueue: events_freezable mmc_rescan
> >> [ 25.836974] Backtrace:
> >> [ 25.839440] [<ce32fea4>] (0xce32fea4) from [<ce32fed4>] (0xce32fed4)
> >> [ 25.845803] Backtrace aborted due to bad frame pointer <cd2f0a54>
> >>
> >> Also confirmed that reverting that change ("mmc: sdhci: Fix voltage switch delay") allows devices to boot properly.
> >>
> >> Had not a chance to test the change when submitted for mainline despite being copied, sorry about that.
> >>
> >> Since that specific commit is also included in the other stable trees (5.4, 5.10, 5.15 and 6.0) I will let you know whether the same issue is present in those trees shortly thereafter.
> >
> > This only appears to impact 4.9, Adrian is there a missing functional dependency for "mmc: sdhci: Fix voltage switch delay" to work correctly on the 4.9 kernel?
>
> The thing that leaps to mind is that "mmc: sdhci: Fix voltage switch delay" returns out of sdhci_set_ios() without releasing the spinlock which was removed in later kernels. I expect below would help, but a revert might allow a more considered response - it is a holiday here today.
I'll just drop them for now from 4.9, thanks!
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-06 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-05 19:08 [PATCH 4.9 00/62] 4.9.335-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-12-05 22:28 ` Jon Hunter
2022-12-05 22:48 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-12-06 0:11 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-12-06 9:23 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-12-06 11:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-12-06 2:51 ` Shuah Khan
2022-12-06 10:31 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y48pbLT3dmA1iQPu@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=kdasu.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=rwarsow@gmx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=srw@sladewatkins.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox