From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBEF1C352A1 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 13:27:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234002AbiLFN1w (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2022 08:27:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32826 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231641AbiLFN1r (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2022 08:27:47 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33926AE68; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 05:27:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id x22so6117314ejs.11; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 05:27:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8gGm5AvWlpFGL9MI7cu+T1k82OabJfNpmbCFTAalHdc=; b=RadXzTZ7omYsfiEgzDAl49cDFWa7za/xIUbGvXGFuM9rVCKqKhRLqm1aLbayIK9c8h LB2CwJ6t8vepNuYaKeOloYMVR8J6g+yP1Rnwjib++yuT2hw5EbgmqwC794+eGvQqSK9p 5uy7ZKcOvH8f36QcYrKz/jVxRukIR24Vl5ir4C/CUjFvPMR8h29rQ13oVVsF5a/YqLLP RDf22Vh0NNqoJHvlcQyoUzQi57+vL0BvkGdrqt9PYVsorCAK9LCxJdewaUGsLjT47E4W 394D7V2BgOmpxMv7EOYaiwta8smfzTZaKnbwC8PgGe8XkI5fbhgyF8CWKyD+pZm2aBNS H10g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=8gGm5AvWlpFGL9MI7cu+T1k82OabJfNpmbCFTAalHdc=; b=ilBYkYtdeIx+MFnfgbWiY9/b7/hw49gQop7TAp1JmYtCZ5PF8QV3fJrae2IJQs0HqC ZTLCWqY6GFHvVz1wVHMSnuJOypDTIaoeAE5qvKhKqBlovzkhv4lDEAKtmDCNxy8PIVa/ hRaHUDX1HKPtBTgNCpgjfXYVllXmuByMiRxaghvXL/mQLIrJIM1vkLHZGf73XylWHOom H7oo+IfQEs5HJG1bsCKO0qO0tUmsLWnsNAs8WTMcU0OdrsXUGMFCzPtCeLORf7Hem+rI ACVyaGtEDFKHJ3alOoVUcETc9P+/uS/IZkafontYxlf7Ofq0lOXiTKZFUklHVLT21Ff8 seBA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmGUw+8MwNk1pf0JZ4viLnsRiXIVmPGh4neEcIqp+ZoqIJrSZUF 33c3GweWCDySjrlFVb2J6nE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4MUqc7enU8xV43/Jc/1OKvAAjNXgI7lJ2oWUsp0NI/WMSCfEaKw0eOXLy/TBpDMLX5Q4ehLg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:48c9:b0:7c0:eb33:e7c2 with SMTP id d9-20020a17090648c900b007c0eb33e7c2mr9196428ejt.666.1670333260625; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 05:27:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from gvm01 (net-2-45-26-236.cust.vodafonedsl.it. [2.45.26.236]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d36-20020a056402402400b004585eba4baesm975704eda.80.2022.12.06.05.27.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Dec 2022 05:27:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 14:27:50 +0100 From: Piergiorgio Beruto To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oleksij Rempel Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] ethtool: add PLCA RS support Message-ID: References: <20221205180527.7cad354c@kernel.org> <20221205201152.4577d15d@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221205201152.4577d15d@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 08:11:52PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 18:05:27 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Dec 2022 03:37:57 +0100 Piergiorgio Beruto wrote: > > > This patchset is related to the proposed "add PLCA RS support and onsemi > > > NCN26000" patchset on the kernel. It adds userland support for > > > getting/setting the configuration of the Physical Layer Collision > > > Avoidance (PLCA) Reconciliation Sublayer (RS) defined in the IEEE 802.3 > > > specifications, amended by IEEE802.3cg-2019. > > > > nit: for the user space patches use the tool name in the subject tag > > [PATCH ethtool-next], I bet quite a few people looked at your set > > expecting kernel changes ;) > > ... which you already figured out / was told. Is a very bad day > for my ability to spot next postings of the same set it seems :S Thanks Jakub, don't worry, I am still learning the process, so better one more feedback than none! BTW, I've just updated the patchset to include all the feedback I did receiver so far. Hopefully this one is good :-) Kind Regards, Piergiorgio