From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B69DC4332F for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:17:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229563AbiKZLR1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Nov 2022 06:17:27 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52332 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229480AbiKZLRY (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Nov 2022 06:17:24 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B04121EED6; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 03:17:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id 5so5180914wmo.1; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 03:17:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EKBlOjDIo+FXnoo/ratYxLq6wevcO8d8/HghKFwYCx4=; b=PdSUeXcyA/vBYOIS46Dxg3XdcZj2UdydFPmSFt+ujsV631OvtyTWC+EF8i++boQIYj Dr//OLHcBDVXrimwn/E9SsbEVXLdNaKi/CQmAzgN5+xSTw9BOM0iU0hz+GEWtrbENPrt EfaUXsaG2CiINFreuUVOJ4jD1zrfSvJVDeRPfY5ehTvolF5JIAK1hwYdr/rQYUnH+pb9 sUAJpXiSwrg10lLuemj5AXs3FzbRntfNcXakSYGXNR4HqwY/OuPA71XQtnURgHwO7Ksp sm51rNaKKMJQL4/9WeIb9NCVxrEqkNKq/Zb85DIBEXfEBxqLpwb+tew8QttZLTn/HN8B tHag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=EKBlOjDIo+FXnoo/ratYxLq6wevcO8d8/HghKFwYCx4=; b=I5WwgyoIacPPGfdLs2EZnmFvCoXvrgQmiY6mIOXoLThmEdKDX0QvwMqjKv8lODqW8e 3CjCeWMy/QMB8lbTSRfdTCaeYq23EoVCDvX2SL3UYXBHvxlaj8gL+WbCAvGG5rHARzi8 foTdQ9m5eZcJUwkkVTWB2ho+e0Du181Pt/2IHAgKfQp6BI+g4S82USX2StufVIq1wG3u mVVBAB6W7VuVYP2iK1WMKhHfI88hdBiTJzTJViIQnAalYxSRG9/c0C+4+uFPbWeqxsBx +vx+GP6f7bnkacAC6Rdsudq8wWDQQzSXgK8dMbCdYuos3cV5WA880V0MMDU+MtCI3JYd DR/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmA2/cOwNjFc4qyJjqJBIWZr7rloTqB47G4PTNXokePgyZPbM7c mLOoKWj2/fEYm3ucCgVhBps= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6ZSRviRwvrfCzcg5u5CU6ujh9mzD4e6f1QEbdq8uAcNdPU4CLP8AHAna4Sj3eSTBDoPPOiSA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:790a:0:b0:3cf:e137:b31d with SMTP id l10-20020a1c790a000000b003cfe137b31dmr21524246wme.205.1669461441065; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 03:17:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o20-20020a05600c4fd400b003c6c5a5a651sm9046745wmq.28.2022.11.26.03.17.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 26 Nov 2022 03:17:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:17:19 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.0 000/313] 6.0.10-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20221125075804.064161337@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221125075804.064161337@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 08:58:38AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.10 release. > There are 313 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Nov 2022 07:57:07 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20221016): mips: 52 configs -> no failure arm: 100 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2226 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2229 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2231 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip