From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD11C4332F for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 13:18:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230267AbiLQNSn (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Dec 2022 08:18:43 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57284 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229452AbiLQNSh (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Dec 2022 08:18:37 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4334D13CEE for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 05:18:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6E04B8077D for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 13:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09C47C433D2; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 13:18:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1671283113; bh=26FMEBU6hkqnKk5Fev0Qg8m9V2JGK2TXo473bevwxVI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=yt3seslVvJWor4vgNGZS3hrCzuNDa6agmW9vS1B2yEZzUCTW9d3s6U7B/sQqDXdd/ 1otl7H2UVI9P7fu7DlOM8U7/OFcfN8BohciOEenMs4m2ptPxsgDXZ7sl3QRfQUqcQb ecpeDACa7KufRK7MoPnWTbbkax/Sw1WRMKUAI+K0= Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 14:18:30 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Kaiwan N Billimoria Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Reg the next LTS kernel (6.1?) Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 06:32:48PM +0530, Kaiwan N Billimoria wrote: > Hi, > Any update on 6.1 being set as the next LTS release? You tell me please. How has your testing gone for 6.1 so far? Does it work properly for you? Are you and/or your company willing to test out the -rc releases and provide feedback if it works or not for your systems? Do you have problems with 6.1.y vs. older kernels? Is there anything missing in it that you feel needs to be addressed with a newer kernel instead? thanks, greg k-h