public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Handle resize in early boot up
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:57:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5NpDF0AnY9ibwEl@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221209101151.1fec1167@gandalf.local.home>

On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 10:11:51AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> With the new command line option that allows trace event triggers to be
> added at boot, the "snapshot" trigger will allocate the snapshot buffer
> very early, when interrupts can not be enabled. Allocating the ring buffer
> is not the problem, but it also resizes it, which is, as the resize code
> does synchronization that can not be preformed at early boot.
> 
> To handle this, first change the raw_spin_lock_irq() in rb_insert_pages()
> to raw_spin_lock_irqsave(), such that the unlocking of that spin lock will
> not enable interrupts.
> 
> Next, where it calls schedule_work_on(), disable migration and check if
> the CPU to update is the current CPU, and if so, perform the work
> directly, otherwise re-enable migration and call the schedule_work_on() to
> the CPU that is being updated. The rb_insert_pages() just needs to be run
> on the CPU that it is updating, and does not need preemption nor
> interrupts disabled when calling it.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y5J%2FCajlNh1gexvo@google.com/
> 
> Fixes: a01fdc897fa5 ("tracing: Add trace_trigger kernel command line option")
> Reported-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
<>
> @@ -2298,9 +2308,17 @@ int ring_buffer_resize(struct trace_buffer *buffer, unsigned long size,
>  		if (!cpu_online(cpu_id))
>  			rb_update_pages(cpu_buffer);
>  		else {
> -			schedule_work_on(cpu_id,
> -					 &cpu_buffer->update_pages_work);
> -			wait_for_completion(&cpu_buffer->update_done);
> +			/* Run directly if possible. */
> +			migrate_disable();
> +			if (cpu_id == smp_processor_id()) {
> +				rb_update_pages(cpu_buffer);
> +				migrate_enable();
> +			} else {
> +				migrate_enable();
> +				schedule_work_on(cpu_id,
> +						 &cpu_buffer->update_pages_work);
> +				wait_for_completion(&cpu_buffer->update_done);

I ran with this patch on my test VM and hit the same Oops from the original
report.

I think the problem is that we're still trying to enable interrupts via
wait_for_completion():

wait_for_completion()
  wait_for_common()
    __wait_for_common()
      raw_spin_unlock_irq()
        _raw_spin_unlock_irq()
          __raw_spin_unlock_irq()
            local_irq_enable()

I'm testing on a QEMU VM with 4 virtual CPUs, if that helps WRT where work is
being scheduled (cpu_id == smp_processor_id).

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-09 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-09 15:11 [PATCH] ring-buffer: Handle resize in early boot up Steven Rostedt
2022-12-09 16:57 ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2022-12-09 18:13   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-12-09 18:32     ` Ross Zwisler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y5NpDF0AnY9ibwEl@google.com \
    --to=zwisler@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox