* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/67] 5.4.227-rc1 review
2022-12-12 13:16 [PATCH 5.4 00/67] 5.4.227-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-12-12 20:11 ` Jon Hunter
2022-12-12 22:30 ` Florian Fainelli
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2022-12-12 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, linux-tegra
On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 14:16:35 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.227 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:08:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.227-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.4:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
59 tests: 59 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.4.227-rc1-g8c05f5e0777d
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/67] 5.4.227-rc1 review
2022-12-12 13:16 [PATCH 5.4 00/67] 5.4.227-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-12-12 20:11 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2022-12-12 22:30 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-12-13 0:02 ` Shuah Khan
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2022-12-12 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On 12/12/22 05:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.227 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:08:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.227-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/67] 5.4.227-rc1 review
2022-12-12 13:16 [PATCH 5.4 00/67] 5.4.227-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-12-12 20:11 ` Jon Hunter
2022-12-12 22:30 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2022-12-13 0:02 ` Shuah Khan
2022-12-13 0:24 ` Guenter Roeck
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2022-12-13 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, Shuah Khan
On 12/12/22 06:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.227 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:08:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.227-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/67] 5.4.227-rc1 review
2022-12-12 13:16 [PATCH 5.4 00/67] 5.4.227-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-13 0:02 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2022-12-13 0:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-13 9:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-12-13 12:02 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2022-12-13 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 02:16:35PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.227 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:08:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 447 pass: 447 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/67] 5.4.227-rc1 review
2022-12-12 13:16 [PATCH 5.4 00/67] 5.4.227-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-13 0:24 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2022-12-13 9:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-12-13 15:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-12-13 12:02 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2022-12-13 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, Baolin Wang, Mike Kravetz
On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 18:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.227 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:08:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.227-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
NOTE:
Following build warning found,
mm/hugetlb.c: In function 'follow_huge_pmd_pte':
mm/hugetlb.c:5191:1: warning: label 'out' defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
5191 | out:
| ^~~
details of commit causing this build warning.
mm/hugetlb: fix races when looking up a CONT-PTE/PMD size hugetlb page
commit fac35ba763ed07ba93154c95ffc0c4a55023707f upstream.
## Build
* kernel: 5.4.227-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.4.y
* git commit: 8c05f5e0777d154e70c3ab34e0fb0e1778b7e23c
* git describe: v5.4.226-68-g8c05f5e0777d
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.226-68-g8c05f5e0777d
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.226)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.226)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.4.226)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.226)
## Test result summary
total: 114898, pass: 99995, fail: 1941, skip: 12727, xfail: 235
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 146 total, 145 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 44 total, 40 passed, 4 failed
* i386: 26 total, 20 passed, 6 failed
* mips: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 30 total, 30 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 35 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/67] 5.4.227-rc1 review
2022-12-13 9:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2022-12-13 15:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-12-13 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, Baolin Wang, Mike Kravetz
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 02:50:21PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 18:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.227 release.
> > There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:08:57 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.227-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
>
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> NOTE:
> Following build warning found,
>
> mm/hugetlb.c: In function 'follow_huge_pmd_pte':
> mm/hugetlb.c:5191:1: warning: label 'out' defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
> 5191 | out:
> | ^~~
>
> details of commit causing this build warning.
> mm/hugetlb: fix races when looking up a CONT-PTE/PMD size hugetlb page
> commit fac35ba763ed07ba93154c95ffc0c4a55023707f upstream.
Thanks, I'll go drop that commit now.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/67] 5.4.227-rc1 review
2022-12-12 13:16 [PATCH 5.4 00/67] 5.4.227-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-13 9:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2022-12-13 12:02 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) @ 2022-12-13 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, srw, rwarsow
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 02:16:35PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.227 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:08:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221127):
mips: 65 configs -> no failure
arm: 106 configs -> no failure
arm64: 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2338
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread