From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB56C4332F for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:48:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239120AbiLNQse (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:48:34 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59948 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239111AbiLNQs3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:48:29 -0500 Received: from mail-oa1-x2a.google.com (mail-oa1-x2a.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::2a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C13B51ADB0 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 08:48:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oa1-x2a.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-144b21f5e5fso17307074fac.12 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 08:48:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9ZhlczTAehV4TLevOCL1Icy4/6JR09M9WK72rd3mnMs=; b=nIvT9Mu11aW5Vk1WHLx1g89M7ss3V5LXebA8v/43vgnvoqqLumfNyzCqmw2JCttOyf 4h4Cp+96tGlbX36bUIMP0hMkRdqmlaNrxJZmsXJLx0Oak7TPLoTvpj9x0QsRI26YJUoa cG9kfY5ciXu3mE7HP2YMjCUHwIWrKVBJXU8VFKS6qBktL5IxBtX/+wABQgeaCm1pzfvI bVIilwANavnB4dZ8DxRbs2BCNLEYf6myBYYKDTX3fNAMrt9A7po9Gl5pwCn6stQ3KUMp u+v/ze2vEz6s++Dtf5bxHbuMnMuf4joQb+DxWmbVAbhWLCGTKavdPF06zQaQbsnJht1D fMsg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=9ZhlczTAehV4TLevOCL1Icy4/6JR09M9WK72rd3mnMs=; b=QKZfuQ29fc8UEZEzI0sSgm22NRdOopZvmn+9RqmTIwSL9EdPaAvhLcSNnSGWjpGVz+ McYdrJ/p/fVJ08CPWHlkjvwMYn6prjq7Uof2inyUGRe9dFwj7nKmbcppTpQp/A5bm8ma eygpLuuRlMbF2j5EsDEgP/YtDQGCkzMjqJfftnveSts2/lH/D4NJHU4/tevA96a2aQab /uCfyPWpLPJGQ/rQTuatyjjRbmsMBrSMT/WKx5zDC4YKiEikzgd/kE7uDI+PgCWG7OsF NqQu2sXMgckfx6D6antYJcV+m0Ux6ovKRFd7j+b+RhJpxZv8qOtYUgUSKCM4OBTv4VCD ynbA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plPcVyeDoCc8GSVUYYGRuHHi/IXGtQXB2YRegxQF49E3N8W2az2 K5n7esAMXCv5g9xPDOQ3NI1V8mAFROc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7gULiH2SMd+11xefcD9oKeR+CAFgeYhlZ/mGQ9xvmq+WRMFTJWvzFRuQo+mMwuJrJno6AGYQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:6084:b0:13a:f11b:b6ad with SMTP id t4-20020a056870608400b0013af11bb6admr12466271oae.20.1671036505002; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 08:48:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([12.97.180.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w6-20020a056871060600b001446480a042sm2884707oan.58.2022.12.14.08.48.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Dec 2022 08:48:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 08:48:23 -0800 From: Yury Norov To: Valentin Schneider Cc: Tariq Toukan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , Rasmus Villemoes Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/cpumask: update comment for cpumask_local_spread() Message-ID: References: <20221213043248.2025029-1-yury.norov@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:47:47AM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote: > On 12/12/22 20:32, Yury Norov wrote: > > Now that we have an iterator-based alternative for a very common case > > of using cpumask_local_spread for all cpus in a row, it's worth to > > mention it in comment to cpumask_local_spread(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov > > --- > > > > Hi Tariq, Valentin, > > > > I rebased your iterators patches on top of cpumask_local_spread() rework. > > (Rebase is not plain simple.) The result is on bitmap-for-next branch, > > and in -next too. > > > > I had a look, LGTM. Does it mean reviewed-by? If so - for the whole cpumask_local_spread() series, or for the last patch?