The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Cc: Wei Chen <harperchen1110@gmail.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
	syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: possible deadlock in __ata_sff_interrupt
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 15:19:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5s7F/4WKe8BtftB@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5eff70b8-04fc-ee87-973a-2099a65f6e29@opensource.wdc.com>

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 06:48:20PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:

> The problem is here: sg_rq_end_io() calling kill_fasync(). But at a quick
> glance, this is not the only driver calling kill_fasync() with a spinlock
> held with irq disabled... So there may be a fundamental problem with
> kill_fasync() function if drivers are allowed to do that, or the reverse,
> all drivers calling that function with a lock held with irq disabled need
> to be fixed.
> 
> Al, Chuck, Jeff,
> 
> Any thought ?

What is the problem with read_lock_irqsave() called with irqs disabled?
read_lock_irq() would have been a bug in such conditions, of course, but
that's not what we use...

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-15 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-13 15:09 possible deadlock in __ata_sff_interrupt Wei Chen
2022-12-15  9:48 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-12-15 15:19   ` Al Viro [this message]
2022-12-16  1:44     ` Damien Le Moal
2022-12-16  3:41       ` Al Viro
2022-12-16 11:26         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-12-16 23:39           ` Al Viro
2022-12-16 23:54             ` Boqun Feng
2022-12-17  1:59               ` Al Viro
2022-12-17  3:25                 ` Boqun Feng
2022-12-17  2:31               ` Linus Torvalds
2022-12-17  2:59                 ` Boqun Feng
2022-12-17  3:05                 ` Al Viro
2022-12-17  4:41                   ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y5s7F/4WKe8BtftB@ZenIV \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=harperchen1110@gmail.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox