[PATCH 5.4 0/9] 5.4.228-rc1 review

[PATCH 5.4 0/9] 5.4.228-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release.
There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.4.228-rc1

Yasushi SHOJI <yasushi.shoji@gmail.com>
    can: mcba_usb: Fix termination command argument

Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
    can: sja1000: fix size of OCR_MODE_MASK define

Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
    pinctrl: meditatek: Startup with the IRQs disabled

Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
    ASoC: ops: Check bounds for second channel in snd_soc_put_volsw_sx()

Jialiang Wang <wangjialiang0806@163.com>
    nfp: fix use-after-free in area_cache_get()

Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
    block: unhash blkdev part inode when the part is deleted

Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
    mm/hugetlb: fix races when looking up a CONT-PTE/PMD size hugetlb page

Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
    x86/smpboot: Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
    net: bpf: Allow TC programs to call BPF_FUNC_skb_change_head


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                                           |  4 +--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c                    |  2 --
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c                          |  1 +
 block/partition-generic.c                          |  7 +++++
 drivers/net/can/usb/mcba_usb.c                     | 10 +++++---
 .../ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cppcore.c   |  3 ++-
 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c                |  9 ++++---
 include/linux/can/platform/sja1000.h               |  2 +-
 include/linux/hugetlb.h                            |  6 ++---
 mm/gup.c                                           | 13 +++++++++-
 mm/hugetlb.c                                       | 30 +++++++++++-----------
 net/core/filter.c                                  |  2 ++
 sound/soc/soc-ops.c                                |  6 +++++
 13 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH 5.4 0/9] 5.4.228-rc1 review

[Shuah Khan]

On 12/15/22 11:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 5.4 0/9] 5.4.228-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 23:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.4.228-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.4.y
* git commit: e538d4b64ed30c6b7248a14b4e8641db4db16736
* git describe: v5.4.227-10-ge538d4b64ed3
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.227-10-ge538d4b64ed3

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.226-68-g8c05f5e0777d)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.226-68-g8c05f5e0777d)

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.4.226-68-g8c05f5e0777d)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.226-68-g8c05f5e0777d)

## Test result summary
total: 114869, pass: 99876, fail: 1964, skip: 12795, xfail: 234

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 146 total, 145 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 44 total, 40 passed, 4 failed
* i386: 26 total, 20 passed, 6 failed
* mips: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 30 total, 30 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 12 total, 11 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 35 passed, 2 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* ltp[
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 5.4 0/9] 5.4.228-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 19:10:27 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v5.4:
    10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
    26 boots:	26 pass, 0 fail
    59 tests:	59 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	5.4.228-rc1-ge538d4b64ed3
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
                tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
                tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon

Re: [PATCH 5.4 0/9] 5.4.228-rc1 review

[Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)]

Hi Greg,

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221127):
mips: 65 configs -> no failure
arm: 106 configs -> no failure
arm64: 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure


Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2361


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

-- 
Regards
Sudip

Re: [PATCH 5.4 0/9] 5.4.228-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 12/15/22 10:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 5.4 0/9] 5.4.228-rc1 review

[Guenter Roeck]

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 447 pass: 447 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 5.4 0/9] 5.4.228-rc1 review

[zhouzhixiu]

On 2022/12/16 2:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.4.228-rc1,

Kernel 
repo:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.4.y
Version: 5.4.228-rc1
Commit: e538d4b64ed30c6b7248a14b4e8641db4db16736
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)

arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9017
passed: 9017
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9017
passed: 9017
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkrobot@huawei.com>