From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36952C4332F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 14:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231949AbiLSOeN (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2022 09:34:13 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38674 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232049AbiLSOeJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2022 09:34:09 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86D03204; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 06:34:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1671460448; x=1702996448; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=4zJim5syjwTCO1ZKhJMIDJLYaQP0FGp1hH1PHRAopJQ=; b=GcpUQ2/P2QnTGmlhbl/G6SOGo/+ymukR3tPdlBFwVbV5DG8bwTkc8GE2 uQDO0BI3ISsa5STJ7TTo+q8UW9W/I8SthL1sZ9KjGRcjhPh2vRzEPA/GX lF4fWDhYMKxG6BcPUWNRhKGTKHpA7kfWnq4DXp/xY1Bt3UZutFzmZ1tHi HW8AxNgHhbglwT2WVjfciBbZ3aQyrcLtqdZVBJb+t6U+yVBEnsaJLdHyX M18sQyPa4W5SkGc/UXuhT0qWNi5RuEDhiCBidLM7cbIuxwpGwa+iPVZMq UPHjBA6j2kRYz3KgQSgrE0vdDla9fNSMFjBqVc9/1way8ubYHq2C6h1P1 g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10566"; a="321254374" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,255,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="321254374" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Dec 2022 06:34:08 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10566"; a="979393144" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,255,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="979393144" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2022 06:34:06 -0800 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BFDC511D; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 16:34:35 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 16:34:35 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: Use same order of bit fields for PADCFG2 Message-ID: References: <20221219123229.5564-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221219123229.5564-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 02:32:29PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > PADCFG0 and PADCFG1 are ordered from MSB to LSB, do the same > for PADCFG2 bit fields. Perhaps: No functional changes. > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Acked-by: Mika Westerberg