From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com,
jsd@semihalf.com, wsa@kernel.org, hdegoede@redhat.com,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] i2c: designware: Fix unbalanced suspended flag
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 15:10:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y6Bi4Q9xyPd2Tc6k@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221219130145.883309-1-rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 01:01:45PM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> Ensure that i2c_mark_adapter_suspended() is always balanced by a call to
> i2c_mark_adapter_resumed().
>
> dw_i2c_plat_resume() must always be called, so that
> i2c_mark_adapter_resumed() is called. This is not compatible with
> DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME, so remove the flag.
>
> Since the controller is always resumed on system resume the
> dw_i2c_plat_complete() callback is redundant and has been removed.
>
> The unbalanced suspended flag was introduced by commit c57813b8b288
> ("i2c: designware: Lock the adapter while setting the suspended flag")
>
> Before that commit, the system and runtime PM used the same functions. The
> DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME was used to skip the system resume if the driver
> had been in runtime-suspend. If system resume was skipped, the suspended
> flag would be cleared by the next runtime resume. The check of the
> suspended flag was _after_ the call to pm_runtime_get_sync() in
> i2c_dw_xfer(). So either a system resume or a runtime resume would clear
> the flag before it was checked.
>
> Having introduced the unbalanced suspended flag with that commit, a further
> commit 80704a84a9f8
> ("i2c: designware: Use the i2c_mark_adapter_suspended/resumed() helpers")
This is still unwrapped propertly, but no need to resend, it so minor, really.
Just a hint for the future submissions.
> changed from using a local suspended flag to using the
> i2c_mark_adapter_suspended/resumed() functions. These use a flag that is
> checked by I2C core code before issuing the transfer to the bus driver, so
> there was no opportunity for the bus driver to runtime resume itself before
> the flag check.
...
> ---
> Changes from v3:
> - Fixed wrapping in commit description. No code changes
Thank you, but see the above :-)
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-19 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-19 13:01 [PATCH v4] i2c: designware: Fix unbalanced suspended flag Richard Fitzgerald
2022-12-19 13:10 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2022-12-19 15:01 ` Jarkko Nikula
2023-01-09 12:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-01-09 12:02 ` Hans de Goede
2023-01-09 12:11 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y6Bi4Q9xyPd2Tc6k@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jsd@semihalf.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox