From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/18] 5.10.161-rc1 review
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 11:18:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y6GZ/NLLnGD4hOYL@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221219182940.701087296@linuxfoundation.org>
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:24:53PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221127):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2409
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2424
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-20 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-19 19:24 [PATCH 5.10 00/18] 5.10.161-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-12-19 22:12 ` Pavel Machek
2022-12-19 22:36 ` Slade Watkins
2022-12-21 1:15 ` Slade Watkins
2022-12-19 23:21 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-12-20 0:22 ` Shuah Khan
2022-12-20 6:57 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-12-20 9:18 ` Rudi Heitbaum
2022-12-20 11:18 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) [this message]
2022-12-20 14:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-20 15:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-20 17:50 ` Jon Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y6GZ/NLLnGD4hOYL@debian \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=rwarsow@gmx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=srw@sladewatkins.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox