[PATCH 5.10 00/18] 5.10.161-rc1 review

[PATCH 5.10 00/18] 5.10.161-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release.
There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.161-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.10.161-rc1

Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
    net: loopback: use NET_NAME_PREDICTABLE for name_assign_type

Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim>
    Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix u8 overflow

José Expósito <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>
    HID: uclogic: Add HID_QUIRK_HIDINPUT_FORCE quirk

Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
    HID: ite: Enable QUIRK_TOUCHPAD_ON_OFF_REPORT on Acer Aspire Switch V 10

Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
    HID: ite: Enable QUIRK_TOUCHPAD_ON_OFF_REPORT on Acer Aspire Switch 10E

Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
    HID: ite: Add support for Acer S1002 keyboard-dock

Ferry Toth <ftoth@exalondelft.nl>
    usb: ulpi: defer ulpi_register on ulpi_read_id timeout

Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
    igb: Initialize mailbox message for VF reset

Reka Norman <rekanorman@chromium.org>
    xhci: Apply XHCI_RESET_TO_DEFAULT quirk to ADL-N

Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
    USB: serial: f81534: fix division by zero on line-speed change

Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
    USB: serial: f81232: fix division by zero on line-speed change

Bruno Thomsen <bruno.thomsen@gmail.com>
    USB: serial: cp210x: add Kamstrup RF sniffer PIDs

Duke Xin <duke_xinanwen@163.com>
    USB: serial: option: add Quectel EM05-G modem

Szymon Heidrich <szymon.heidrich@gmail.com>
    usb: gadget: uvc: Prevent buffer overflow in setup handler

Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
    udf: Fix extending file within last block

Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
    udf: Do not bother looking for prealloc extents if i_lenExtents matches i_size

Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
    udf: Fix preallocation discarding at indirect extent boundary

Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
    udf: Discard preallocation before extending file with a hole


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                                  |  4 +-
 drivers/hid/hid-ids.h                     |  2 +
 drivers/hid/hid-ite.c                     | 26 ++++++++++-
 drivers/hid/hid-uclogic-core.c            |  1 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c |  2 +-
 drivers/net/loopback.c                    |  2 +-
 drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c                 |  2 +-
 drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c       |  5 +-
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c               |  4 +-
 drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c               |  2 +
 drivers/usb/serial/f81232.c               | 12 +++--
 drivers/usb/serial/f81534.c               | 12 +++--
 drivers/usb/serial/option.c               |  3 ++
 fs/udf/inode.c                            | 76 ++++++++++++++-----------------
 fs/udf/truncate.c                         | 48 ++++++-------------
 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c                |  3 +-
 16 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/18] 5.10.161-rc1 review

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 796 bytes --]

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel
         
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/18] 5.10.161-rc1 review

[Slade Watkins]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 2:28 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Hi,
Compiled and tested on my x86_64 test systems, no errors or
regressions to report.

Yours,
-- Slade

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/18] 5.10.161-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 12/19/22 11:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.161-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/18] 5.10.161-rc1 review

[Shuah Khan]

On 12/19/22 12:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.161-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/18] 5.10.161-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 00:58, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.161-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.161-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: bc32b2c55e20a98b04c9ccb34c50e4fbd7f2b8cd
* git describe: v5.10.160-19-gbc32b2c55e20
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.160-19-gbc32b2c55e20

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.160)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.160)

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.160)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.160)

## Test result summary
total: 120764, pass: 105386, fail: 2229, skip: 12725, xfail: 424

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 147 total, 146 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 45 total, 43 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 35 total, 33 passed, 2 failed
* mips: 27 total, 24 passed, 3 failed
* parisc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 28 total, 23 passed, 5 failed
* riscv: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 38 total, 36 passed, 2 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/18] 5.10.161-rc1 review

[Rudi Heitbaum]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:24:53PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Hi Greg,

5.10.161-rc1 tested.

Run tested on:
- Intel Skylake x86_64 (nuc6 i5-6260U)

In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- Allwinner H6
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro

Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
--
Rudi

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/18] 5.10.161-rc1 review

[Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)]

Hi Greg,

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:24:53PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221127):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2409
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2424


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

-- 
Regards
Sudip

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/18] 5.10.161-rc1 review

[Guenter Roeck]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:24:53PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 162 pass: 162 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 475 pass: 475 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/18] 5.10.161-rc1 review

[Guenter Roeck]

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 06:48:08AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:24:53PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release.
> > There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 162 pass: 162 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 475 pass: 475 fail: 0
> 

Also wrong. Sorry.

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/18] 5.10.161-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:24:53 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.161-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v5.10:
    11 builds:	11 pass, 0 fail
    28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
    75 tests:	75 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	5.10.161-rc1-gbc32b2c55e20
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/18] 5.10.161-rc1 review

[Slade Watkins]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 5:36 PM Slade Watkins <srw@sladewatkins.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 2:28 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release.
> > There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>

Hi,
I noticed that the original message was missing my Tested-by...

> Compiled and tested on my x86_64 test systems, no errors or
> regressions to report.

Same applies.

Tested-by: Slade Watkins <srw@sladewatkins.net>

Sorry,
-- Slade
(via his corrected script)