public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] reset: starfive: jh71x0: Use 32bit I/O on 32bit registers
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 22:49:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y6I7+apspEgczfzG@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221220005054.34518-7-hal.feng@starfivetech.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6250 bytes --]

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 08:50:49AM +0800, Hal Feng wrote:
> From: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>
> 
> We currently use 64bit I/O on the 32bit registers. This works because
> there are an even number of assert and status registers, so they're only
> ever accessed in pairs on 64bit boundaries.
> 
> There are however other reset controllers for audio and video on the
> JH7100 SoC with only one status register that isn't 64bit aligned so
> 64bit I/O results in an unaligned access exception.
> 
> Switch to 32bit I/O in preparation for supporting these resets too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com>
> ---
>  .../reset/starfive/reset-starfive-jh7100.c    | 14 ++++-----
>  .../reset/starfive/reset-starfive-jh71x0.c    | 31 +++++++++----------
>  .../reset/starfive/reset-starfive-jh71x0.h    |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/starfive/reset-starfive-jh7100.c b/drivers/reset/starfive/reset-starfive-jh7100.c
> index 5f06e5ae3346..2a56f7fd4ba7 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/starfive/reset-starfive-jh7100.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/starfive/reset-starfive-jh7100.c
> @@ -30,16 +30,16 @@
>   * lines don't though, so store the expected value of the status registers when
>   * all lines are asserted.
>   */
> -static const u64 jh7100_reset_asserted[2] = {
> +static const u32 jh7100_reset_asserted[4] = {
>  	/* STATUS0 */
> -	BIT_ULL_MASK(JH7100_RST_U74) |
> -	BIT_ULL_MASK(JH7100_RST_VP6_DRESET) |
> -	BIT_ULL_MASK(JH7100_RST_VP6_BRESET) |
> +	BIT(JH7100_RST_U74 % 32) |
> +	BIT(JH7100_RST_VP6_DRESET % 32) |
> +	BIT(JH7100_RST_VP6_BRESET % 32),

And this change is required cos BITS_PER_LONG is 64 for rv64 and
therefore you cannot use BIT_MASK, right?

Otherwise, does look to be a 64 -> 32 conversion, `word-diff` coming in
super handy for this series!
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

>  	/* STATUS1 */
> -	BIT_ULL_MASK(JH7100_RST_HIFI4_DRESET) |
> -	BIT_ULL_MASK(JH7100_RST_HIFI4_BRESET),
> +	BIT(JH7100_RST_HIFI4_DRESET % 32) |
> +	BIT(JH7100_RST_HIFI4_BRESET % 32),
>  	/* STATUS2 */
> -	BIT_ULL_MASK(JH7100_RST_E24) |
> +	BIT(JH7100_RST_E24 % 32),
>  	/* STATUS3 */
>  	0,
>  };
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/starfive/reset-starfive-jh71x0.c b/drivers/reset/starfive/reset-starfive-jh71x0.c
> index 1f201c612583..c62d0c309c62 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/starfive/reset-starfive-jh71x0.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/starfive/reset-starfive-jh71x0.c
> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
>  #include <linux/bitmap.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
> -#include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
>  #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>  #include <linux/reset-controller.h>
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> @@ -19,7 +18,7 @@ struct jh71x0_reset {
>  	spinlock_t lock;
>  	void __iomem *assert;
>  	void __iomem *status;
> -	const u64 *asserted;
> +	const u32 *asserted;
>  };
>  
>  static inline struct jh71x0_reset *
> @@ -32,12 +31,12 @@ static int jh71x0_reset_update(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>  			       unsigned long id, bool assert)
>  {
>  	struct jh71x0_reset *data = jh71x0_reset_from(rcdev);
> -	unsigned long offset = BIT_ULL_WORD(id);
> -	u64 mask = BIT_ULL_MASK(id);
> -	void __iomem *reg_assert = data->assert + offset * sizeof(u64);
> -	void __iomem *reg_status = data->status + offset * sizeof(u64);
> -	u64 done = data->asserted ? data->asserted[offset] & mask : 0;
> -	u64 value;
> +	unsigned long offset = id / 32;
> +	u32 mask = BIT(id % 32);
> +	void __iomem *reg_assert = data->assert + offset * sizeof(u32);
> +	void __iomem *reg_status = data->status + offset * sizeof(u32);
> +	u32 done = data->asserted ? data->asserted[offset] & mask : 0;
> +	u32 value;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -46,15 +45,15 @@ static int jh71x0_reset_update(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
>  
> -	value = readq(reg_assert);
> +	value = readl(reg_assert);
>  	if (assert)
>  		value |= mask;
>  	else
>  		value &= ~mask;
> -	writeq(value, reg_assert);
> +	writel(value, reg_assert);
>  
>  	/* if the associated clock is gated, deasserting might otherwise hang forever */
> -	ret = readq_poll_timeout_atomic(reg_status, value, (value & mask) == done, 0, 1000);
> +	ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(reg_status, value, (value & mask) == done, 0, 1000);
>  
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);
>  	return ret;
> @@ -88,10 +87,10 @@ static int jh71x0_reset_status(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>  			       unsigned long id)
>  {
>  	struct jh71x0_reset *data = jh71x0_reset_from(rcdev);
> -	unsigned long offset = BIT_ULL_WORD(id);
> -	u64 mask = BIT_ULL_MASK(id);
> -	void __iomem *reg_status = data->status + offset * sizeof(u64);
> -	u64 value = readq(reg_status);
> +	unsigned long offset = id / 32;
> +	u32 mask = BIT(id % 32);
> +	void __iomem *reg_status = data->status + offset * sizeof(u32);
> +	u32 value = readl(reg_status);
>  
>  	return !((value ^ data->asserted[offset]) & mask);
>  }
> @@ -105,7 +104,7 @@ static const struct reset_control_ops jh71x0_reset_ops = {
>  
>  int reset_starfive_jh71x0_register(struct device *dev, struct device_node *of_node,
>  				   void __iomem *assert, void __iomem *status,
> -				   const u64 *asserted, unsigned int nr_resets,
> +				   const u32 *asserted, unsigned int nr_resets,
>  				   struct module *owner)
>  {
>  	struct jh71x0_reset *data;
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/starfive/reset-starfive-jh71x0.h b/drivers/reset/starfive/reset-starfive-jh71x0.h
> index ac9e80dd3f59..db7d39a87f87 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/starfive/reset-starfive-jh71x0.h
> +++ b/drivers/reset/starfive/reset-starfive-jh71x0.h
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
>  
>  int reset_starfive_jh71x0_register(struct device *dev, struct device_node *of_node,
>  				   void __iomem *assert, void __iomem *status,
> -				   const u64 *asserted, unsigned int nr_resets,
> +				   const u32 *asserted, unsigned int nr_resets,
>  				   struct module *owner);
>  
>  #endif /* __RESET_STARFIVE_JH71X0_H */
> -- 
> 2.38.1
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-20 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-20  0:50 [PATCH v3 00/11] Basic clock and reset support for StarFive JH7110 RISC-V SoC Hal Feng
2022-12-20  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] clk: starfive: Factor out common JH7100 and JH7110 code Hal Feng
2022-12-20 21:54   ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-20  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] clk: starfive: Rename "jh7100" to "jh71x0" for the common code Hal Feng
2022-12-20 22:08   ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-23  6:23     ` Hal Feng
2022-12-20  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] reset: Create subdirectory for StarFive drivers Hal Feng
2022-12-20 22:15   ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-23  7:02     ` Hal Feng
2022-12-20  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] reset: starfive: Factor out common JH71X0 reset code Hal Feng
2022-12-20 22:28   ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-23  7:49     ` Hal Feng
2022-12-20  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] reset: starfive: Rename "jh7100" to "jh71x0" for the common code Hal Feng
2022-12-20  2:40   ` kernel test robot
2022-12-20 22:31   ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-24  3:48   ` kernel test robot
2022-12-20  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] reset: starfive: jh71x0: Use 32bit I/O on 32bit registers Hal Feng
2022-12-20 22:49   ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2022-12-20  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] dt-bindings: clock: Add StarFive JH7110 system clock and reset generator Hal Feng
2022-12-20 20:12   ` Rob Herring
2022-12-20 23:14   ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-20 23:16     ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-25 16:26     ` Hal Feng
2022-12-27 20:15       ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-16 14:42         ` Hal Feng
2023-02-16 18:20           ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-17  2:27             ` Hal Feng
2023-02-17  7:51               ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-17 12:20                 ` Hal Feng
2023-02-17 13:32                   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-17 15:47                     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-02-17 16:27                       ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-18 10:20                         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-02-18 11:17                           ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-18 14:55                             ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-02-18 15:08                               ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-21 22:17             ` Stephen Boyd
2023-02-21 23:39               ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-22 13:27                 ` Hal Feng
2023-02-22 16:26                   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-23  3:03                     ` Hal Feng
2023-02-23  6:18                       ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-23  9:52                         ` Hal Feng
2022-12-20  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] dt-bindings: clock: Add StarFive JH7110 always-on " Hal Feng
2022-12-20 20:14   ` Rob Herring
2022-12-20 23:19   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-16 17:19     ` Hal Feng
2022-12-20  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] clk: starfive: Add StarFive JH7110 system clock driver Hal Feng
2022-12-23  9:57   ` kernel test robot
2023-01-05 11:32   ` kernel test robot
2023-02-19 21:23   ` Emil Renner Berthing
2023-02-21  6:44     ` Hal Feng
2022-12-20  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] clk: starfive: Add StarFive JH7110 always-on " Hal Feng
2022-12-23 11:28   ` kernel test robot
2023-01-05 13:44   ` kernel test robot
2022-12-20  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] reset: starfive: Add StarFive JH7110 reset driver Hal Feng
2022-12-20  7:14   ` kernel test robot
2022-12-23 12:39   ` kernel test robot
2022-12-27 19:20   ` kernel test robot
2023-01-05 15:35   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y6I7+apspEgczfzG@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com \
    --cc=hal.feng@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox