public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
Cc: "Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	"Moritz Fischer" <mdf@kernel.org>, "Wu Hao" <hao.wu@intel.com>,
	"Xu Yilun" <yilun.xu@intel.com>, "Tom Rix" <trix@redhat.com>,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	system@metrotek.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] fpga: microchip-spi: rewrite status polling in a time measurable way
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:50:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y6xXmcCa4L9iz5qm@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221227100450.2257-3-i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2821 bytes --]

On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 01:04:49PM +0300, Ivan Bornyakov wrote:
> Original busy loop with retries count in mpf_poll_status() is not too
> reliable, as it takes different times on different systems. Replace it
> with read_poll_timeout() macro.
> 
> While at it, fix polling stop condition to met function's original
> intention declared in the comment. The issue with original polling stop
> condition is that it stops if any of mask bits is set, while intention
> was to stop if all mask bits is set. This was not noticible because only
> MPF_STATUS_READY is passed as mask argument and it is BIT(1).
> 
> Fixes: 5f8d4a900830 ("fpga: microchip-spi: add Microchip MPF FPGA manager")
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
> ---
>  drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c b/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c
> index e72fedd93a27..8d1d9476d0cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>  #include <asm/unaligned.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> @@ -33,7 +34,7 @@
>  
>  #define	MPF_BITS_PER_COMPONENT_SIZE	22
>  
> -#define	MPF_STATUS_POLL_RETRIES		10000
> +#define	MPF_STATUS_POLL_TIMEOUT		(2 * USEC_PER_SEC)
>  #define	MPF_STATUS_BUSY			BIT(0)
>  #define	MPF_STATUS_READY		BIT(1)
>  #define	MPF_STATUS_SPI_VIOLATION	BIT(2)
> @@ -197,21 +198,16 @@ static int mpf_ops_parse_header(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
>  /* Poll HW status until busy bit is cleared and mask bits are set. */
>  static int mpf_poll_status(struct mpf_priv *priv, u8 mask)
>  {
> -	int status, retries = MPF_STATUS_POLL_RETRIES;
> +	int ret, status;
>  
> -	while (retries--) {
> -		status = mpf_read_status(priv);
> -		if (status < 0)
> -			return status;
> -
> -		if (status & MPF_STATUS_BUSY)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		if (!mask || (status & mask))
> -			return status;
> -	}

Would you mind moving the small comment before the function down to here
and mentioning handling the failure case?
The current implementation is a bit easier to understand than the new
version that's wrapped in read_poll_timeout().

Otherwise, change seems like a good idea.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

> +	ret = read_poll_timeout(mpf_read_status, status,
> +				(status < 0) ||
> +				((status & (MPF_STATUS_BUSY | mask)) == mask),
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
>  
> -	return -EBUSY;
> +	return status;
>  }
>  
>  static int mpf_spi_write(struct mpf_priv *priv, const void *buf, size_t buf_size)
> -- 
> 2.38.2
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-28 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-27 10:04 [PATCH v3 0/3] Reliability improvements for Microchip MPF FPGA manager Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-27 10:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] fpga: microchip-spi: move SPI I/O buffers out of stack Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-28 14:42   ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-27 10:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] fpga: microchip-spi: rewrite status polling in a time measurable way Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-27 10:22   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2022-12-28 14:50   ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2022-12-27 10:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] fpga: microchip-spi: separate data frame write routine Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-28 14:54   ` Conor Dooley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y6xXmcCa4L9iz5qm@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=system@metrotek.ru \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox