From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Vineet Gupta <vineetg@rivosinc.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
palmer@rivosinc.com, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
linux@rivosinc.com, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: elf: add .riscv.attributes parsing
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 22:29:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y73mvsYpEv8FxXPR@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dfffd3ab-d607-9b1f-92a5-24a798807849@rivosinc.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 750 bytes --]
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 02:16:58PM -0800, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 1/10/23 14:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:18:41PM -0800, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> # code under CONFIG_COMPAT
> > You can drop this, even if it reported against a private branch AFAIU,
> > just like its complaints about patches. As Greg would say, LKP didn't
> > report a feature!
>
> OK. Personally I tend to add Tested-by (vs. Reported-by for the same
> reasons) to still give them the credit for finding some issue.
> I can certainly drop it.
What I've seen Greg say is that you don't add "Reported-by" if someone
tells you your patch doesn't compile, so why would you for the build
robots.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-10 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-10 20:18 [PATCH] riscv: elf: add .riscv.attributes parsing Vineet Gupta
2023-01-10 20:48 ` Jessica Clarke
2023-01-10 21:50 ` Vineet Gupta
2023-01-10 23:21 ` Jessica Clarke
2023-01-10 23:45 ` Vineet Gupta
2023-01-11 0:29 ` Jessica Clarke
2023-01-10 22:04 ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-10 22:16 ` Vineet Gupta
2023-01-10 22:29 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-01-11 16:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2023-01-12 20:22 ` Vineet Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y73mvsYpEv8FxXPR@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@rivosinc.com \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=vineetg@rivosinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox