[PATCH] regulator: qcom-rpmh: PM8550 ldo11 regulator is an nldo

[PATCH] regulator: qcom-rpmh: PM8550 ldo11 regulator is an nldo

[Neil Armstrong]

This fixes the definition of the PM8550 ldo11 regulator matching it's
capabilities since this LDO is designed to work between 1,2V and 1,5V.

Fixes: e6e3776d682d ("regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add support for PM8550 regulators")
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c
index 43b5b9377714..ae6021390143 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c
@@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ static const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data pm8550_vreg_data[] = {
 	RPMH_VREG("ldo8",   "ldo%s8",  &pmic5_pldo_lv, "vdd-l8-l9"),
 	RPMH_VREG("ldo9",   "ldo%s9",  &pmic5_pldo,    "vdd-l8-l9"),
 	RPMH_VREG("ldo10",  "ldo%s10", &pmic5_nldo,    "vdd-l1-l4-l10"),
-	RPMH_VREG("ldo11",  "ldo%s11", &pmic5_pldo,    "vdd-l11"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo11",  "ldo%s11", &pmic5_nldo,    "vdd-l11"),
 	RPMH_VREG("ldo12",  "ldo%s12", &pmic5_pldo,    "vdd-l12"),
 	RPMH_VREG("ldo13",  "ldo%s13", &pmic5_pldo,    "vdd-l2-l13-l14"),
 	RPMH_VREG("ldo14",  "ldo%s14", &pmic5_pldo,    "vdd-l2-l13-l14"),

---
base-commit: 1b929c02afd37871d5afb9d498426f83432e71c2
change-id: 20230102-topic-sm8550-upstream-fixes-reg-l11b-nldo-b4de2cb35d0b

Best regards,
-- 
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>

Re: [PATCH] regulator: qcom-rpmh: PM8550 ldo11 regulator is an nldo

[Abel Vesa]

On 23-01-02 12:23:20, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> This fixes the definition of the PM8550 ldo11 regulator matching it's
> capabilities since this LDO is designed to work between 1,2V and 1,5V.
> 
> Fixes: e6e3776d682d ("regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add support for PM8550 regulators")
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>

> ---
>  drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c
> index 43b5b9377714..ae6021390143 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c
> @@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ static const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data pm8550_vreg_data[] = {
>  	RPMH_VREG("ldo8",   "ldo%s8",  &pmic5_pldo_lv, "vdd-l8-l9"),
>  	RPMH_VREG("ldo9",   "ldo%s9",  &pmic5_pldo,    "vdd-l8-l9"),
>  	RPMH_VREG("ldo10",  "ldo%s10", &pmic5_nldo,    "vdd-l1-l4-l10"),
> -	RPMH_VREG("ldo11",  "ldo%s11", &pmic5_pldo,    "vdd-l11"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo11",  "ldo%s11", &pmic5_nldo,    "vdd-l11"),
>  	RPMH_VREG("ldo12",  "ldo%s12", &pmic5_pldo,    "vdd-l12"),
>  	RPMH_VREG("ldo13",  "ldo%s13", &pmic5_pldo,    "vdd-l2-l13-l14"),
>  	RPMH_VREG("ldo14",  "ldo%s14", &pmic5_pldo,    "vdd-l2-l13-l14"),
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 1b929c02afd37871d5afb9d498426f83432e71c2
> change-id: 20230102-topic-sm8550-upstream-fixes-reg-l11b-nldo-b4de2cb35d0b
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>

Re: [PATCH] regulator: qcom-rpmh: PM8550 ldo11 regulator is an nldo

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, 02 Jan 2023 12:23:20 +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> This fixes the definition of the PM8550 ldo11 regulator matching it's
> capabilities since this LDO is designed to work between 1,2V and 1,5V.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: qcom-rpmh: PM8550 ldo11 regulator is an nldo
      commit: f528fe213a6ad21a6e8644dbd5de10dc264a89fd

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark