From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: microchip: mpfs-ccc: Use devm_kasprintf() for allocating formatted strings
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 13:40:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7WBtMmLzYvk60tD@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdX--sfenmb7WMgpe5045YfR7UjXAM-T9ZNZO3eTN_R=bg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1838 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 02:26:53PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 6:32 PM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
> > I half wonder if this should actually have a fixes tag too. Since it
> > used what came after the @ in $full_name, it'd be possible to create
> > (an incorrect) DTS that would lead to a clash between pll names &
> > therefore probe would fail.
> > The tag would be:
> > Fixes: d39fb172760e ("clk: microchip: add PolarFire SoC fabric clock support")
>
> But I don't change any of that in my patch?
> /me confused.
The numbers in there were chosen to fit exactly what is in mpfs.dtsi
(IOW the correct node address), so doing
@@ -201,14 +200,13 @@ static int mpfs_ccc_register_plls(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_ccc_pll_hw_clo
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < num_clks; i++) {
struct mpfs_ccc_pll_hw_clock *pll_hw = &pll_hws[i];
- char *name = devm_kzalloc(dev, 18, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!name)
+ pll_hw->name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "ccc%s_pll%u",
+ strchrnul(dev->of_node->full_name, '@'), i);
+ if (!pll_hw->name)
return -ENOMEM;
pll_hw->base = data->pll_base[i];
- snprintf(name, 18, "ccc%s_pll%u", strchrnul(dev->of_node->full_name, '@'), i);
- pll_hw->name = (const char *)name;
pll_hw->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS_DATA_FIXED_SIZE(pll_hw->name,
pll_hw->parents,
&mpfs_ccc_pll_ops, 0);
means that we no longer have to worry that someone would provide a
device tree with a node address that would make "ccc<node_address>_pll<N>"
exceed 18 characters. If that happened, the <N> would be cut off & both
pll 0 & 1 would be named identically. If that happens, pll1 would fail
to register.
Or am I misunderstanding something? Probably am..
Thanks,
Conor.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-04 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-03 16:45 [PATCH] clk: microchip: mpfs-ccc: Use devm_kasprintf() for allocating formatted strings Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-03 17:32 ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-04 13:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-04 13:40 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-01-04 13:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-11 19:26 ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-12 8:52 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2023-01-12 10:04 ` Claudiu.Beznea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y7WBtMmLzYvk60tD@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@microchip.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox