From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665F5C61DB3 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 08:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236527AbjAII0Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 03:26:24 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42386 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236505AbjAII0S (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 03:26:18 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFD956572; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 00:26:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id m8-20020a05600c3b0800b003d96f801c48so8384746wms.0; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:26:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GtUHkTRRfiNW5TLc5bwX/ucBfvpI6oGzoNoxA/kdcb4=; b=PX/Re6EXO5D5x2aOrBoI7eA99YcH6y0uQW4Vy4O2TGXKH6hdNRvrsHnBZ+Ubcv6tiQ TXL+WU+PKwozsVIYHmrowUrubNx4OdxGGBXm6FVfKXw/LCApwYZoSbyIsca39fx+QV1E 3ZxqQvtEQCEoLV/2KlNULgPiCnKnr+TvOMtU57t0W/50RjnVAUjWgJD4D+dA59AVoKWh GEf+f2o1uqAtruBo7es8ttxLoVYaE+bRhLQe3VRGhpiyVNwe01Snp693OaYjzSAdrzV4 j9VOFaaboM1rMGg1fsBk8OrP0MfGOgOoXRKaV7Ugk8swmNYtUZuiZKCDU98Ui/EnhUWr TFLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=GtUHkTRRfiNW5TLc5bwX/ucBfvpI6oGzoNoxA/kdcb4=; b=uWwnMpr6j64t3c8NhZVQLOY8g9xznOyDRYM6iAbUewDHXVa6I3QB87DRrYMM/br4fg ycLPoYagA4NNfcDvvO046xsyRXH+rSSW2Wk7hNo2akx6sm1aJw5uSKhU5wWMXYPsyPYu nUu4gsXY5aKOcrr1KGgCWNFvEtwpzIe9V5vhy1md17h6YeKIPHwm1T+KHwY5nETZKG5s fyYkzPJR9HlRYobtE6qE3RaoxHK5zyLGB9Gb81Rbie88EWA2JgP9r27p3QQ8ryV0cz54 0W1yQye+Ssq4/sOx4E4qqSUUbnITyd/++pI8VCcGyfA6f52cT1OWSn5RBKOJyByprd4t xCnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krOBksguDCSlIu+paWWk4M166gqMdDW4MAj9BCmO5tHZ1hCPHkD 7ezD38HWbR4wY1SIgfeDQxs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXuAKMUeskJfUuvD8C9z9OcPka00Get8EuUaW0pYUVKXK+LmkvJIxuFXAbNoY9jOuXApvBte+A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b82:b0:3cf:900c:de6b with SMTP id n2-20020a05600c3b8200b003cf900cde6bmr45739129wms.15.1673252776288; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:26:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([102.36.222.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i6-20020a05600c4b0600b003d9e91cd08dsm5605620wmp.4.2023.01.09.00.26.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:26:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 11:26:05 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Christophe JAILLET Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Vineet Gupta , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] bit_spinlock: Include Message-ID: References: <8b81101d59a31f4927016c17e49be96754a23380.1673204461.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8b81101d59a31f4927016c17e49be96754a23380.1673204461.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 08:04:44PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > In an attempt to simplify some includes in , it > appeared, when compiling fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c, that > was relying on other includes to get the definition of cpu_relax(). > (see [1]) > > It broke on arc. > > Include in to fix the issue. > This will help remove some un-needed includes from . > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202301082130.LXMj5qkD-lkp@intel.com/ > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET > --- > Not sure who to send this to. > get_maintainer.pl is of no help, and the file is untouched from a too long > time. > > Greg? Dan? Any pointer? Andrew Morton is the maintainer of last resort. Plus spinlocks seem like something he would be interested in. Otherwise Ingo, Peter Z and the x86 team. regards, dan carpenter