From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yhs@meta.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
memxor@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] bpf: Use BPF_KFUNC macro at all kfunc definitions
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 08:15:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8/oGIEjibbbNaE2@maniforge.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y8+FeH7rz8jDTubt@infradead.org>
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:15:04PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I don't think this is the way to go. For one the syntax looks odd,
> and for another count we had a rough agreement at the kernel summit
> to make BPF kfuncs look more like export symbols.
>
> So can you please try to instad make this a EXPORT_SYMBOL_BPF that
> looks and feels more like EXPORT_SYMBOL instead?
Yeah, that matches what others (Daniel and Jon) have suggested in
another thread. I'll echo what I said in [0], which is essentially that
I agree with you all that something which more closely resembles
EXPORT_SYMBOL* is a better approach, and am fine with tabling this for
now until I have a bit more bandwidth to work on something that's a more
complete / appropriate solution.
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y88sMlmrq0wCFSRP@maniforge.lan/
Thanks for the review! Will CC you on the v3, whenever that is.
- David
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-24 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-23 17:15 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] Add BPF_KFUNC macro for kfunc definitions David Vernet
2023-01-23 17:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] bpf: Add BPF_KFUNC macro for defining kfuncs David Vernet
2023-01-23 17:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] bpf: Document usage of the new BPF_KFUNC macro David Vernet
2023-01-23 17:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] bpf: Use BPF_KFUNC macro at all kfunc definitions David Vernet
2023-01-23 18:33 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-01-23 18:48 ` David Vernet
2023-01-23 18:54 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-01-23 19:01 ` David Vernet
2023-01-23 19:04 ` Daniel Borkmann
2023-01-23 21:00 ` Jonathan Corbet
2023-01-24 0:54 ` David Vernet
2023-01-24 14:50 ` Jonathan Corbet
2023-01-24 16:20 ` David Vernet
2023-01-31 15:15 ` Alan Maguire
2023-01-31 15:44 ` David Vernet
2023-01-31 17:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-01-23 19:01 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-23 19:12 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-24 7:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-24 14:15 ` David Vernet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y8/oGIEjibbbNaE2@maniforge.lan \
--to=void@manifault.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox