public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
	Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Initialize mode_config earlier
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 09:09:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8+SHQ/klPwusQRj@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230123171749.GA623918@hu-bjorande-lv.qualcomm.com>

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 09:17:49AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:01:45PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 09:04:39AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:51:22PM -0600, Bjorn Andersson wrote:

> > > > Perhaps we have shuffled other things around to avoid this bug?  Either
> > > > way, let's this on hold  until further proof that it's still
> > > > reproducible.
> > > 
> > > As I've mentioned off list, I haven't hit the apparent race I reported
> > > here:
> > > 
> > > 	https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y1efJh11B5UQZ0Tz@hovoldconsulting.com/
> > > 
> > > since moving to 6.2. I did hit it with both 6.0 and 6.1-rc2, but it
> > > could very well be that something has changes that fixes (or hides) the
> > > issue since.
> > 
> > For unrelated reasons, I tried enabling async probing, and apart from
> > apparently causing the panel driver to probe defer indefinitely, I also
> > again hit the WARN_ON() I had added to catch this:
> > 
> > [   13.593235] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 125 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c:664 drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event+0x48/0x7
> > 0 [drm_kms_helper]

> > So the bug still appears to be there (and the MSM DRM driver is fragile
> > and broken, but we knew that).
> > 
> 
> But the ordering between mode_config.funcs = !NULL and
> drm_kms_helper_poll_init() in msm_drm_init() seems pretty clear.
> 
> And my testing shows that drm_kms_helper_poll_init() is the cause for
> getting bridge->hpd_cb != NULL.
> 
> So the ordering seems legit, unless there's something else causing the
> assignment of bridge->hpd_cb to happen earlier in this scenario.

I'm not saying that this patch is correct (indeed it doesn't seem to
be), but only that the bug I reported still appears to be present in
6.2.

Now that I actually looked at this again, I realise that the reason that
haven't seen it with 6.2 is more likely due to the fact that I'm now
making sure to load the panel driver before the drm driver to avoid that
unnecessary probe deferral.

With async probing, I get the probe deferral again, and boom, I hit the
same old NULL deref.

I see there's a call to drm_kms_helper_poll_fini() in msm_drm_uninit()
which should stop the polling, but perhaps there's still some corner
case due to the unexpected probe (or rather component bind) deferral
which we're hitting.

Johan

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-24  8:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-13  4:10 [PATCH] drm/msm: Initialize mode_config earlier Bjorn Andersson
2023-01-13  4:23 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-01-13  8:57   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-01-17  2:51     ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-01-17  8:04       ` Johan Hovold
2023-01-23 16:01         ` Johan Hovold
2023-01-23 17:17           ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-01-24  8:09             ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2023-01-24  8:24               ` Johan Hovold
2023-03-01 13:58               ` Johan Hovold
2023-03-02 23:17                 ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-03-08  9:58                   ` Johan Hovold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y8+SHQ/klPwusQRj@hovoldconsulting.com \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_bjorande@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox