public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Please add oops_limit to -stable
@ 2023-01-20  0:26 Kees Cook
  2023-01-22 13:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2023-01-20  0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: SeongJae Park, Seth Jenkins, Jann Horn, stable, linux-kernel

Hi,

I'd like to ask that the oops_limit series get included in -stable
releases. It's a recommended defense developed while writing this
report:
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2023/01/exploiting-null-dereferences-in-linux.html

I've had a few people ask about having it in -stable, for example:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230119201023.4003-1-sj@kernel.org

This is the series:

9360d035a579 panic: Separate sysctl logic from CONFIG_SMP
d4ccd54d28d3 exit: Put an upper limit on how often we can oops
9db89b411170 exit: Expose "oops_count" to sysfs
de92f65719cd exit: Allow oops_limit to be disabled
79cc1ba7badf panic: Consolidate open-coded panic_on_warn checks
9fc9e278a5c0 panic: Introduce warn_limit
8b05aa263361 panic: Expose "warn_count" to sysfs
00dd027f721e docs: Fix path paste-o for /sys/kernel/warn_count
7535b832c639 exit: Use READ_ONCE() for all oops/warn limit reads

For v6.1.x they apply cleanly and behave as expected.

I'm hoping someone can step up and do backports for v5.15.x and earlier,
as there appear to be a number of conflicts and I'm swamped with other
stuff to do. :P

Thanks!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-22 13:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-20  0:26 Please add oops_limit to -stable Kees Cook
2023-01-22 13:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox