From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: paulmck@kernel.org, quic_neeraju@quicinc.com,
joel@joelfernandes.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: Fix the start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() be invoked very early
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:18:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8AIkL0ZT7nhiYFK@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230112075629.1661429-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 03:56:29PM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> Currently, the start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() can be invoked
> very early. before rcu_init(), the rcu_data structure's->mynode is not
> initialized, if invoke start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() before
> rcu_init(), will trigger a null rcu_node structure's->exp_seq_poll access.
>
> This commit add boot_exp_seq_poll_rq member to rcu_state structure to
> store seq number return by invoke start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited()
> very early.
>
> Fixes: d96c52fe4907 ("rcu: Add polled expedited grace-period primitives")
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Just a nit below:
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 3 ++-
> kernel/rcu/tree.h | 1 +
> kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 6 ++++--
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 63545d79da51..12f0891ce7f4 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ static struct rcu_state rcu_state = {
> .exp_mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(rcu_state.exp_mutex),
> .exp_wake_mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(rcu_state.exp_wake_mutex),
> .ofl_lock = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
> + .boot_exp_seq_poll_rq = RCU_GET_STATE_COMPLETED,
> };
>
> /* Dump rcu_node combining tree at boot to verify correct setup. */
> @@ -4938,7 +4939,7 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
> qovld_calc = qovld;
>
> // Kick-start any polled grace periods that started early.
> - if (!(per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu)->mynode->exp_seq_poll_rq & 0x1))
> + if (!(rcu_state.boot_exp_seq_poll_rq & 0x1))
This can be "if (!(rcu_state.boot_exp_seq_poll_rq == RCU_GET_STATE_COMPLETED))"
> (void)start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited();
>
> rcu_test_sync_prims();
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> index 192536916f9a..ae50ca6853ad 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> @@ -397,6 +397,7 @@ struct rcu_state {
> /* Synchronize offline with */
> /* GP pre-initialization. */
> int nocb_is_setup; /* nocb is setup from boot */
> + unsigned long boot_exp_seq_poll_rq;
A comment on the right can mention: "/* exp seq poll request before rcu_init() */"
Thanks!
> };
>
> /* Values for rcu_state structure's gp_flags field. */
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> index 956cd459ba7f..1b35a1e233d9 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> @@ -1068,9 +1068,11 @@ unsigned long start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
> if (rcu_init_invoked())
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->exp_poll_lock, flags);
> if (!poll_state_synchronize_rcu(s)) {
> - rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq = s;
> - if (rcu_init_invoked())
> + if (rcu_init_invoked()) {
> + rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq = s;
> queue_work(rcu_gp_wq, &rnp->exp_poll_wq);
> + } else
> + rcu_state.boot_exp_seq_poll_rq = s;
> }
> if (rcu_init_invoked())
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->exp_poll_lock, flags);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-12 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-12 7:56 [PATCH v2] rcu: Fix the start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() be invoked very early Zqiang
2023-01-12 13:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2023-01-12 14:54 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-01-12 19:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-13 9:12 ` Zhang, Qiang1
2023-01-13 12:10 ` Zhang, Qiang1
2023-01-13 12:19 ` Zhang, Qiang1
2023-01-13 14:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-13 15:02 ` Zhang, Qiang1
2023-01-13 15:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y8AIkL0ZT7nhiYFK@lothringen \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang1.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox